youwhatref   10 #13 Posted May 12, 2006 They have to cut around the lens of the eyeball and flap it over before doing it - that'd put me off for starters.  They dont have to. That is LASEK (?), they have a more routine surgery which doesn't involve that.  I wear contact lenses and have always considered it but i'm not convinced my eyes wont deteriorate over time again. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
kristo   10 #14 Posted May 12, 2006 Just seen this advert on tv..£395 per eye..who can afford that??? I could get one eye done and leave the other...but at the risk of the clinic thinking i was a tight get  I paid £2,500 for to get both eyes done. This was a few years ago so I would expect that prices have fallen since then. I could have gone for cheaper options at the time, but went with Boots thinking that a large reputable organisation would be less likely to ruin my eyesight!!  If you have to go 'bargin basement' I would have a good think about whether to do it at all. There are risks involved and you really need to stack the odds in your favour. I did a lot or reading about it and different companies use different equiptment (Boots was the only place that did 'radar tracking' of the eye at the time), and employ surgeons with different levels of experience etc etc.  I'm not saying that you get what you pay for, but PLEASE don't go for the cheapest without comparing factors other than price! I estimate that I've already saved more than £1500 in glasses and contact lenses so think of it as a long-term investment.  Good luck if you go ahead! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
kristo   10 #15 Posted May 12, 2006 ..... Sorry. I've just read the thread properly!! You have near perfect eyesight now?!! Then a reputable company will not do it for very obvious reasons. There is a margin of error so even with no mistakes you could end up with worse vision than before.  You wouldn't have a kidney transplant today because you worry about kidney failure in 20 years time would you? I know it's not the same, but it's not completely different. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
seriessix   10 #16 Posted May 12, 2006 I was referring to LASEK. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
pitsmoorlad   10 #17 Posted May 12, 2006 My daughter in law's had it done recently. Cost 3 grand but she says it was worth it. Apparently there was a conference involving top opthalmic consultants in London last year. My wife works with a doctor who was present, and the entire table of top eye doctors all wore glasses. No laser surgery for them then. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
alchresearch   214 #18 Posted May 12, 2006 I could have gone for cheaper options at the time, but went with Boots thinking that a large reputable organisation would be less likely to ruin my eyesight!!  Hope it wasn't around this time:  http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/3607818.stm Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Anj1364 Â Â 10 #19 Posted May 12, 2006 See here: http://www.sheffieldforum.co.uk/showthread.php?t=58556 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
bananapie   10 #20 Posted May 12, 2006 My daughter in law's had it done recently. Cost 3 grand but she says it was worth it. Apparently there was a conference involving top opthalmic consultants in London last year. My wife works with a doctor who was present, and the entire table of top eye doctors all wore glasses. No laser surgery for them then.  There is a reason for this. If you are short sighted (unless it's really bad) you have good near vision. When you get to middle age you will be able to read by taking off your distance glasses, whereas a normal sighted at the same age would need reading glasses. Many people that have surgery tend towards becoming long sighted (i.e needing reading glasses). Therefore if you were an short sighted eye surgeon doing minute close up for a living you aren't going to want to sacrifice your good close vision in order to do away with distance specs. Also surgery can't stop the natural ageing of the eye. So if any of these top docs were wearing reading glasses - there isn't really an alternative at the moment.  For short sighted people who don't need perfect near vision for their occupation surgery can make a massive difference to their life. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
alchresearch   214 #21 Posted May 12, 2006 I don't know if my short-sightedness is bad (-3.25) but I've found the monthly disposable contact lenses from Specsavers to be fantastic. You pop them in and wear them continuously for 30 days (even sleeping in them) and then throw them away at the end. The best thing is that you cannot feel them at al.  Specsavers are still doing the month free trial, sign up and do one month after that (currently £15.50) and then buy your lenses online from Tesco. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
cactus jack   10 #22 Posted May 16, 2006 its about £6000 for both eyes atm but it will be £20000 in 10 years when you need to fix the problem if you dont know what i mean look it up Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...