Jump to content

Racist, sexually abusive, self obsessed president elect

Recommended Posts

because they need to be challenged at every opportunity

 

I totally disagree with what these protestors stand for HOWEVER - the murdered ladies mum claims we should keep up the struggle against intolerance - by being intolerant.

 

Face to face conflict never works -.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
because they need to be challenged at every opportunity

 

So you condone violence if you don't agree with them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The UAF are the perfect example of trouble causers counter protesting and looking for a fight .

 

As far as the psychology is concerned it makes no difference if they are far-right or far-left. Both require rehabilitation to bring them out from the cold.

 

Both the far-left and the far-right have sacred values which must not be challenged, and anyone who challenges these values are considered evil and a threat to their existence.

 

This is just a continuation of religion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So you condone violence if you don't agree with them.

 

You'll be accusing him of naziism next..he never condoned violence, you just made that up.

 

---------- Post added 14-08-2017 at 23:20 ----------

 

I totally disagree with what these protestors stand for HOWEVER - the murdered ladies mum claims we should keep up the struggle against intolerance - by being intolerant.

 

Face to face conflict never works -.

 

Do you think it's justifiable to be intolerant of someone who is so intolerant they're are prepared to kill for it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You'll be accusing him of naziism next..he never condoned violence, you just made that up.

 

---------- Post added 14-08-2017 at 23:20 ----------

 

 

Do you think it's justifiable to be intolerant of someone who is so intolerant they're are prepared to kill for it?

 

Churchill did 1939 sorry Neville Chamberlain

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[/b]

 

Churchill did 1939 sorry Neville Chamberlain

 

Is that a yes you agree with it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Is that a yes you agree with it?

 

 

It is a to negative question to answer , you have to know what they are intolerant off.

 

but yes if some one was going to kill me i would be very intolerant.

 

 

So the answer to your question to me is yes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
because they need to be challenged at every opportunity

 

 

This. Tactic worked well against the National Front in 1977 and more recently against the EDL.

 

Obviously new extreme right wing groups will spring up. The ideology of control of the streets seems important to " fascist " groups. Appeasement of Nazis doesn't work

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This. Tactic worked well against the National Front in 1977 and more recently against the EDL.

Obviously new extreme right wing groups will spring up. The ideology of control of the streets seems important to " fascist " groups. Appeasement of Nazis doesn't work

 

So the NF and EDL no longer exist or hold those views any longer?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The thing here is that Trump didn't want to single out the white Nazis as he got in on the back of voters that basically wanted to Make America White/1955 again.

 

This latter group aren't as anything like as overtly racist as the Nazis but he knows that these core voters in the rust belt will sympathise a lot more with the Neo Nazis than they will will the antifa.

 

Because of this dynamic expect the US Neo Nazis to become increasingly emboldened.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

cant understand the furore over this . one group protesting, another group protesting about the protesters , BOTH groups involved in violence against the other group . Trump says both groups were involved were in violence . Where is the problem in telling the truth ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
cant understand the furore over this . one group protesting, another group protesting about the protesters , BOTH groups involved in violence against the other group . Trump says both groups were involved were in violence . Where is the problem in telling the truth ?

 

when did it become socially acceptable to drive a vehicle into a group of civilians with the intention of killing them.

 

Weren't we united in condemning similar acts of terrorism on the streets of London and Paris a couple of months ago.

 

Je Suis le French and all that nonsense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.