Racist, sexually abusive, self obsessed president elect

[harvey19 541]

President Trump is trying to get on with running the country.

A majority of Americans voted for him and support him.

A minority of vociferous people do not.

The country should get behind him and demonstrate their support for Their elected President.

Those who were not eligible to vote in the American election should maybe direct their political energies towards their own country. A positive step would be to stand for public office as a councillor or M.P.

[unbeliever 10]

President Trump is trying to get on with running the country.

A majority of Americans voted for him and support him.

A minority of vociferous people do not.

The country should get behind him and demonstrate their support for Their elected President.

Those who were not eligible to vote in the American election should maybe direct their political energies towards their own country. A positive step would be to stand for public office as a councillor or M.P.

 

No they didn't.

46% voted for Trump and 48% for Clinton.

But he did win fair and square according to the agreed rules.

[Obelix 11]

Why won't others just let him get on with running the country instead of having anti President Trump demonstrations and accusing him of all sorts of things.

 

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances

 

I think they are the reasons why

 

---------- Post added 06-03-2017 at 18:35 ----------

 

President Trump is trying to get on with running the country.

A majority of Americans voted for him and support him.

 

No they didn't....

 

Popular vs college vote etc.

[melthebell 862]

President Trump is trying to get on with running the country.

A majority of Americans voted for him and support him.

A minority of vociferous people do not.

The country should get behind him and demonstrate their support for Their elected President.

Those who were not eligible to vote in the American election should maybe direct their political energies towards their own country. A positive step would be to stand for public office as a councillor or M.P.

do you have an opinion on the **** hes stirring with everybody else? yet providing NO evidence at all?

Its quite clearly there for all to see, seems to spend more time doing that than anything else.

Other americans too, seems he likes the russians more than his own countrymen, does that make him a traitor?

[harvey19 541]

Better to be friends with Russia than enemies I would have thought.

[Supertramp 10]

Has anyone here heard of George Soros? Does anyone know what he buys with his money, say in the USA? Does anyone know how much he lost backing Hillery? Does anyone know how many charitable organizations he funds. Does anyone know what these organizations do that he funds?

 

Possibly not!

 

Well some might remember him from Black Friday over here in the UK when he crashed the pound and make a killing???

 

Did he fund the coup in Ukraine in any way?

 

Does he like or dislike Russia?

 

Some on this site might like to find things out about what is behind the news, what is behind the demonstrations in the USA, who pays for getting demonstrations organised, the logistics, transportation etc?

 

So maybe in the age of instant news, all to be taken at face value in simplistic form, as in right and wrong, good or evil, so easy to consume and digest, and then onto the next piece of interest to squabble over, learning nothing but exercising opinions, as they are far more interesting, more an emotional something to get fired up by, its what makes the us males.

 

But knowledge is power, and if some git knows more than you, then they are a threat, and we all know that verbal threats, and the occasional need to flex muscles, spill a bit of blood in the dirt adds to our confidence. So some prefer confrontation for its own sake to actually bringing something to the table, better to make a scene be Mr. Big Rollocks, and not many have such large Gahoonies as Mr deep pockets Soros. He helps make the news for TV not down the pub.

 

So behind every story there is often a lot more going on, and those that demand evidence are obviously too lazy to type it out, on google and see for themselves, but have to resort to chucking the toys out the pram and screaming, and there are quite few who have modified pram toy behaviors it seems.

 

So you can take all the propaganda about Trump as truth, but where does this truth come from, where is the evidence he is a misogynist, with daughters galore, like all daughters confident father will as usual dance for them. Maybe looking at Trump without the soundtrack shaping your opinions just might allow you to see things that the words try to obscure. As for a racist, whenever I see him round a table with his team, this racist appears to have an African American right next to him, obviously advising him, not the sort of thing a racist would tolerate I thought.

 

But some love gossip, the curtain twitchers, the speculators that know nothing but have opinions based on personal prejudices, calling other racists without evidence, or real misogynists who live in green houses might think before lobbing opinions abut?

 

Ooohh someone has been reading Breitbart.

[sgtkate 10]

Ooohh someone has been reading Breitbart.

 

I'd not sure he/she is bright enough to get beyond pretty pictures and lines saying:

 

'deh took er jerbs'!

[saunaman 10]

Thought all mention of "BB" was verboten on this site ?

[Magilla 510]

President Trump is trying to get on with running the country.

 

Doesn't look like it, he's already eclipsed both Obama *and* Biden's expenses for the entire year in just 7 weeks trotting off to his holiday home.

 

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/donald-trump-costs-trips-security-taxpayer-barack-obama-month-year-a7586261.html

 

At the rate he's appointing people into the posts needed to effectively run the government he won't be ready to start for another 3 years!

 

Trumpcare looks like it's DOA. Doesn't look like he had a clue what hes talking about: "Who knew healthcare could be so complicated?". He never had a plan "beautiful" or otherwise.

 

Even fake news central, Brietbart is waking up to how useless their man is:-

 

 

Doesn't look like Melania is that keen either... $500,000 a day for someone to hide away:-

 

http://nypost.com/2017/02/15/melania-trump-is-absolutely-miserable-as-first-lady/

 

Pretty much everything he's done has so far been a disaster, the sheer number of lies he's told since entering office and particularly his twitter tirades.

 

Apparenlty he doesn't like "unidentified sources" of information, despite running on exactly that as the main proponent of the "Birther Movement", again, eventually shown to be nonsense.

 

Travel ban was a complete disaster, the man doesn't have any knowledge of the constitution he's supposed to uphold...

 

A majority of Americans voted for him and support him. A minority of vociferous people do not.

 

Not true, Clinton won the popular vote by ~3m votes.

 

http://time.com/4608555/hillary-clinton-popular-vote-final/

 

The country should get behind him and demonstrate their support for Their elected President.

 

His views don't represent those of the majority of Americans who voted, and so far he seems completely incapable of doing the job.

 

Why would anyone in good concience demonstrate their support for someone who makes up "alternative facts" to cover their lies. Would you follow someone who demonstrably lies more often than not?

 

Those who were not eligible to vote in the American election should maybe direct their political energies towards their own country. A positive step would be to stand for public office as a councillor or M.P.

 

Cool, when and where are you running?

Edited March 9, 2017 by Magilla

[Jeffrey Shaw 90]

Clinton won the popular vote by ~3m votes.

So? That's not how election results nationwide are determined, whether in the USA or the UK.

[Magilla 510]

So?

 

So Harvey is incorrect to suggest that the majority of Americans voted for him as per his post #631 (which I quoted BTW), they didn't.

 

That's not how election results nationwide are determined, whether in the USA or the UK.

 

Clearly!

[melthebell 862]

 

Trumpcare looks like it's DOA. Doesn't look like he had a clue what hes talking about: "Who knew healthcare could be so complicated?".

 

oh yes he knows about healthcare tut tut tch

http://i.imgur.com/7ezz73D.jpg