Jump to content

Tories to bring back Grammar schools

Recommended Posts

Are they? On what do you base this?

 

By talking to people ? I can be old-fashioned like that :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
By talking to people ? I can be old-fashioned like that :)

 

I find that anecdotal evidence is generally unreliable. :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The people who espouse grammar school generally are the ones who assume their kids will pass the entrance exam.

If they make a comeback, I think we'll see some shocked and disappointed grammar school champions around :hihi:

 

i think you will find that there will be a higher percentage of people that aspire to Grammer schools that will pass the exam:roll:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Are they? On what do you base this?

 

I have seen a survey that said only 2% of the UK population consider themselves below average intelligence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You ll notice of course that pretty much everyone in the shadow cabinet went to a grammar school, I'd take a wild guess that most of the top mp's, civil servants and pretty much everyone else in the'establishment' either send their children to private schools or moved to areas that give access to the top state schools or pretend to be religious for faith schools. Obviously only the children of little, ordinary, poor people aren't entitled to the best chance of making the most of their potential.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have seen a survey that said only 2% of the UK population consider themselves below average intelligence.

:suspect:

... so the other 97% of us must obviously regard ourselves above average intelligence? :huh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You ll notice of course that pretty much everyone in the shadow cabinet went to a grammar school, I'd take a wild guess that most of the top mp's, civil servants and pretty much everyone else in the'establishment' either send their children to private schools or moved to areas that give access to the top state schools or pretend to be religious for faith schools. Obviously only the children of little, ordinary, poor people aren't entitled to the best chance of making the most of their potential.

 

I wonder if Diane Abbott will dare to make any comment on these proposals?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You ll notice of course that pretty much everyone in the shadow cabinet went to a grammar school, I'd take a wild guess that most of the top mp's, civil servants and pretty much everyone else in the'establishment' either send their children to private schools or moved to areas that give access to the top state schools or pretend to be religious for faith schools. Obviously only the children of little, ordinary, poor people aren't entitled to the best chance of making the most of their potential.

 

Correct me if I'm wrong but aren't/weren't grammar schools free? You just need to be clever enough? The fact a lot of the shadow cabinet went to grammar schools just shows they were academically bright. Which is a good thing, no?

 

---------- Post added 08-09-2016 at 17:18 ----------

 

:suspect:

... so the other 97% of us must obviously regard ourselves above average intelligence? :huh:

 

Not quite.

 

https://yougov.co.uk/news/2014/05/05/only-2-say-they-are-below-average-intelligence/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Correct me if I'm wrong but aren't/weren't grammar schools free? You just need to be clever enough? The fact a lot of the shadow cabinet went to grammar schools just shows they were academically bright. Which is a good thing, no?

 

---------- Post added 08-09-2016 at 17:18 ----------

 

 

Not quite.

 

https://yougov.co.uk/news/2014/05/05/only-2-say-they-are-below-average-intelligence/

:hihi:

What a load of tosh that appears to be!

 

The 7% who don't know would seem, on the face of it, to obviously be the thickest.

 

But in reality they are obviously the brightest, as without any empirical information to go on, how could they possibly think otherwise? :huh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That's the thing.. selection already happens. Rich people can afford to buy houses in the catchment areas for the best schools, and so they are effectively paying for a better quality of education.

 

There is some selection; when they get to A levels there is selection; but all selection would not be good.

Imagine if we had grammar schools at age 7.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
better schools are made that way usually because the quality of the area and pupils that live in that area

 

Not necessarily the case for grammar schools as they have a higher bar to climb before entering. Take QE grammar in Gainsborough; it's an excellent school but I know from first hand experience that it's a forgotten entity behind the walls, surrounded by grotty terraces and junkies kipping on sofas in the street. Few if any of it's pupils are from Gainsborough itself, they come in from miles away.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There is some selection; when they get to A levels there is selection; but all selection would not be good.

Imagine if we had grammar schools at age 7.

 

There is not enough selection tho when it comes to A levels - it is so easy to get A's (or now A*) at A level it does little to differentiate between pupils in the top 25%.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.