Jump to content

The end of the Labour party

Where will Labour be a year from now?  

171 members have voted

  1. 1. Where will Labour be a year from now?

    • Intact with Jeremy Corbyn in charge
      57
    • Intact with somebody else in charge
      20
    • Split with Corbyn running the remains of Labour
      32
    • Split with Corbyn running a break-away party
      9
    • The matter will still be unresolved
      21
    • The whole party will collapse
      26
    • Something I haven't thought of
      6


Recommended Posts

Whataboutism at its finest.

 

Nothing to add about The Great Leaders deceit?

Edited by Jonny5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes you're right the Guardian is well known for its pro-Corbyn, pro Labour bias.

Meanwhile back at coalition of chaos HQ

 

---------- Post added 24-07-2017 at 07:35 ----------

 

 

Interesting isn't it, when she was in her former roles she kept her head down and ploughed on with apparent vigour "to get the job done". Yet after her elevation to the top slot it's apparent that she's not suited to leadership, humourless, thin skinned, anxious, only comfortable issuing instructions that her position power gives her, and seemingly incapable of thinking "out of the box".

No wonder her advisors wouldn't allow her to debate in any shape or form with Corbyn.

 

She reminds me of Gordon Brown whose ambition powered him to the top only to be found out as lacking in the human traits necessary to perform well.

 

Get real.

 

The Guardian hates Corbyn and spent two years trying to destroy him.

 

As for May at the Home Office......she was responsible for multi-year failures to control immigration, failing to meet the targets her own party made. And she left us with a extremism crisis and a seriously depleted police service. She was a disaster.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But there is no editorial or opinion in the Guardian article? They are only reporting what he said?

 

Have you now reached a stage where any article or comment on the Great Leader that is not wholly gushing must be condemned without further thought?

 

Is it not worth some sort of questioning that he didn't know the cost but still implied that student debt would be wiped out? Is that not devious? Getting people's hopes up and buying votes In that way?

 

Fascinating.

Edited by Jonny5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
But there is no editorial or opinion in the Guardian article? They are only reporting what he said?

 

Have you now reached a stage where any article or comment on the Great Leader that is not wholly gushing must be condemned without further thought?

 

Is it not worth some sort of questioning that he didn't know the cost but still implied that student debt would be wiped out? Is that not devious? Getting people's hopes up and buying votes In that way?

 

Fascinating.

 

good post , Bravo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Get real.

 

The Guardian hates Corbyn and spent two years trying to destroy him.

 

As for May at the Home Office......she was responsible for multi-year failures to control immigration, failing to meet the targets her own party made. And she left us with a extremism crisis and a seriously depleted police service. She was a disaster.

 

 

Err... you don't do irony do you ?

 

---------- Post added 27-07-2017 at 15:50 ----------

 

But there is no editorial or opinion in the Guardian article? They are only reporting what he said?

 

Have you now reached a stage where any article or comment on the Great Leader that is not wholly gushing must be condemned without further thought?

 

Is it not worth some sort of questioning that he didn't know the cost but still implied that student debt would be wiped out? Is that not devious? Getting people's hopes up and buying votes In that way?

 

Fascinating.

 

Corbyn said that he understood the concern and would look into it. He added that due to the short time between Maybot calling the Election and June 8th they

didn't have time to put together a policy.

The bulls...t started within the Conservative party and the right wing tabloid attack dogs ran with it, no surprise there.

The Lib Dems and Tories are desperate to cut into Labours youth vote.

Let's face it the liberal press, Guardian, Indépendant, Observer and the BBC are no Corbyn lovers are they ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Corbyn said that he understood the concern and would look into it. He added that due to the short time between Maybot calling the Election and June 8th they

didn't have time to put together a policy.

The bulls...t started within the Conservative party and the right wing tabloid attack dogs ran with it, no surprise there.

The Lib Dems and Tories are desperate to cut into Labours youth vote.

Let's face it the liberal press, Guardian, Indépendant, Observer and the BBC are no Corbyn lovers are they ?

 

Old fashion printed press controlled by one side will become something of the past as old people who still buy papers die. Full size front page photo of Corbyn with bin laden is no match to the funny may video's on youtube.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Full size front page photo of Corbyn with bin laden is no match to the funny may video's on youtube.

 

How come she beat him then?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ah, such a caring party:

 

Momentum win control of Labour branch and demand MP 'apologises' for criticising Jeremy Corbyn

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/07/06/momentum-win-control-labour-branch-demand-mp-apologises-criticising/

 

I predict a return to in-fighting again, especially with out of control Momentum nutters. They're like the people Cameron talked about in UKIP.

 

 

 

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jul/06/labour-mps-critical-of-corbyn-fear-deselection-after-get-on-board-warning

 

I see the new Tory campaign group Activate has got off to a good start.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4837690/Activate-apologises-members-suggest-gassing-chavs.html

 

I doubt they'll have much luck wooing the youth vote.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

Just seen a Jeremy Corbyn interview with Laura Keunsberg. Why oh why is that burned out shell of a pier, made worse with a dull foggy sky, used as a backdrop?? are the BBC having a laugh with subliminal symbolism?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.