Jump to content

The Rich Get Richer 2

Recommended Posts

If British banks bought bad loans it's because they were too greedy, and failed to do their due diligence. And the UK regulators, under Brown's watchful one good eye, were less than useless. They nodded through RBS' takeover of ABN Amro at 3 times the market rate (just because Barclay's were sniffing around too), knowing that the ABN Amro had already sold off its most profitable bank, and RBS bought not much more than a collection of bad loans for about £71 billion. And every penny of that £71 billion was borrowed. It was greed and stupidity, nothing less. Even Fred the Shred tried to stop the deal when he realised too late he had been had. And Brown's non-existent regulation of the banks allowed it to happen on his watch.

 

It seems that Jim Graham believes banks are bad and that robust regulation is essential. That is most welcome news.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My eyesight is not what it was, I read GB. My apologies. Of course I know what the G8 is.

 

---------- Post added 20-07-2016 at 18:19 ----------

 

 

Thankyou Mr M. But don't worry, I am well used to the arrogance of some posters on here.

 

 

No you didn't, don't blame your eyes. You tried to correct him, one can tell that by the (?) You put after "GB", you then made the false claim that Germany had outperformed us.

 

Your replies to people on this topic "you obviously know very little about the circumstances leading up to the world financial crash. I suggest you do some research", was far more flippant than mine, and actually the reason I responded in the manner I did.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

No you didn't, don't blame your eyes. You tried to correct him, one can tell that by the (?) You put after "GB", you then made the false claim that Germany had outperformed us.

 

Your replies to people on this topic "you obviously know very little about the circumstances leading up to the world financial crash. I suggest you do some research", was far more flippant than mine, and actually the reason I responded in the manner I did.

________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Well you obviously know me and all about me. Obviously even better than I know myself. I bow to your greater knowledge. You must be some kind of genius, or even psychic.... Who would have thought... :rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It seems that Jim Graham believes banks are bad and that robust regulation is essential. That is most welcome news.

 

I have written extensively that the lack of robust regulation in other areas, as well as banking, are the cause of much of the public's dissatisfaction with and mistrust of the political classes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have written extensively that the lack of robust regulation in other areas, as well as banking, are the cause of much of the public's dissatisfaction with and mistrust of the political classes.

 

We can only speculate regarding whether Jim Graham is personally dissatisfied with the lack of robust regulation, in banking and/or more generally.

 

I would suggest that the recent referendum powerfully demonstrated that populist notions were far more prominent in the minds of ordinary people than any unease relating to regulation, and that it was these notions which generated a misplaced and ultimately self-defeating backlash against the political classes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.