Jump to content

Understanding the universe.

Recommended Posts

46 minutes ago, Robin-H said:

Or more fundamentally, is there a flat earth explanation as to why the earth is patently, demonstrably and visibly spherical? 

cos its a conspiracy and every picture and photo ever shown to us is wrong and a lie LOL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, petemcewan said:

InSight is now on Mars-a great achievement for humankind.

Has it disappeared over the horizon yet?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/28/2018 at 5:15 PM, MAC33 said:

Lol - the sun never does go over the horizon that is the point flat earthers are making.

 

Look at street lights on a flat road. The greater the distance the street lights are away from you - the lower they appear. Of course they are not lower it is just perspective.

 

As for the sun always being visible,rubbish again. The angle of the suns rays are directed down like a torch - it will therefore light up only where the rays contact.

 

 

Do flatearthers have an explanation of Foucault's Pendulum  ( I assume they think we're not on a spinning flat earth)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep,as it mentions in the Bible there is a great deception.

 

Spinning ball......who the fark me that one up.lol?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, MAC33 said:

Yep,as it mentions in the Bible there is a great deception.

 

 

What has the bible got to do with science?

 

Watched the sun setting yet and then tried to bring it back into sight with binoculars / telescope?  Nobodies ever managed it yet - wonder why......................................

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Physics: 

 

The conventional approach to the subject of digital electronics is to concentrate on the current in wires-with some additional consideration of voltages between wires.

Heaviside concentrated primarily on what he called,"Energy Current",this being the electromagnetic field which travels in the dielectric between the wires. 

This is a bit different than the idea that the signal is an electric current that travels down copper wires.

For all you scientists, engineers and electricians brought up on the  Faraday and Maxwell explanations, I ask you to seriously look at what Heaviside was proposing. Heaviside's Electrical Papers of 1892 are not the ramblings of a dunce.

 

Edited by petemcewan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.