Quadruple amputee told to prove he still needs PIP

[Hesther 10]

Its very easy to be critical, and certainly this case seems insane, however welfare costs have to be contained and were possible lowered. IDS has done an excellent job in challenging the sacred cows of socialist ideology and long may he do so.

 

When welfare costs are brought under control, taxation fairly wrought, genuine claimants such as the man mentioned should be afforded ever more generous treatment. This can only be done by a government that has clear well thought out policies and rigorous enforcement.

 

We are getting ths under the Tories after years of Labour profligacy and inept management.

 

:hihi: Please don't stop them coming.

 

Yes, what a great job IDS has done for the country. He should treat himself to a big breakfast on us. Oh, wait a minute....he already does at £39.00

[Anna B 1,401]

Cutbacks are necessary for one reason only, the Labour party spent all our money. The Tories are slowly getting it back, too slow for me to be honest but progress is progress.

 

Will you please get off that. There's always enough money for bombs and wars, always enough money for the House of Lords to snore their day away at £300 a time, enough money for moats and duck houses, and so on....

 

Cutbacks are considered as OK cause it only affects people the Tories have no connection with, living a life they have no understanding of, and who have no power to fight back, and are therefore expendable.

[onewheeldave 22]

Will you please get off that. There's always enough money for bombs and wars, always enough money for the House of Lords to snore their day away at £300 a time, enough money for moats and duck houses, and so on....

 

Cutbacks are considered as OK cause it only affects people the Tories have no connection with, living a life they have no understanding of, and who have no power to fight back, and are therefore expendable.

 

:thumbsup:

spot on- whatever the state of the economy, there's always plenty of cash for bombs, weapons, 'war on drugs', 'war on terror', oppression of innocents.

 

When will people realise that the scum politicians who come up with these insane policies, can only do so because the people are so deluded as to let them continue to do so.

[willman 10]

:thumbsup:

spot on- whatever the state of the economy, there's always plenty of cash for bombs, weapons, 'war on drugs', 'war on terror', oppression of innocents.

When will people realise that the scum politicians who come up with these insane policies, can only do so because the people are so deluded as to let them continue to do so.

 

There are also people who support those actions,so should we give up those actions or give up charitable work and give the money elsewhere with no checks and balances.

[Ted Heath 10]

Will you please get off that. There's always enough money for bombs and wars, always enough money for the House of Lords to snore their day away at £300 a time, enough money for moats and duck houses, and so on....

 

Cutbacks are considered as OK cause it only affects people the Tories have no connection with, living a life they have no understanding of, and who have no power to fight back, and are therefore expendable.

 

The first responsibility of any government is the security of the nation. Unless its a Labour government we seldom get involved in an aggressive war.

 

You attack the House of Lords, I sympathize,would you rather have an elected second chamber? The members would need to be paid. Or would you prefer the House of Commons to be able to pass laws without the scrutiny of another house?

 

The expenses debacle was a disgrace, I note only Labour MPs were actually convicted of fraud.

 

I live and work in South Yorkshire, born and bred here. Kids went to local Comps, I am a Tory, have I no understanding of life? Or is this "undersanding" you speak of confined to the arrogant, envious, destructive left?

[Anna B 1,401]

The first responsibility of any government is the security of the nation. Unless its a Labour government we seldom get involved in an aggressive war.

 

You attack the House of Lords, I sympathize,would you rather have an elected second chamber? The members would need to be paid. Or would you prefer the House of Commons to be able to pass laws without the scrutiny of another house?

 

The expenses debacle was a disgrace, I note only Labour MPs were actually convicted of fraud.

 

I live and work in South Yorkshire, born and bred here. Kids went to local Comps, I am a Tory, have I no understanding of life? Or is this "undersanding" you speak of confined to the arrogant, envious, destructive left?

 

Yes, you are a Tory.

 

A typical died-in-the-wool Tory who is so obviously never going to change his views no matter what argument is put before him, therefore it would be pointless trying to discuss anything with you.

[onewheeldave 22]

There are also people who support those actions,so should we give up those actions or give up charitable work and give the money elsewhere with no checks and balances.

 

If cutbacks are necessary, then we should cutback on buying weapons/building bombs/'war on drugs' etc, well before cutting health, welfare and benefits.

[iansheff 84]

The first responsibility of any government is the security of the nation. Unless its a Labour government we seldom get involved in an aggressive war.

 

In that case then why did Cameron get rid of the Harriers and the Canberras, not to mention leaving us without an aircraft carrier, the 2 new carriers won't be in commission till about 2020. Is that responsible?

[Ghozer 112]

There's not enough space here, and I don't have enough time....

 

my DWP DISASTER story is way too long, and way too complicated....

[Mister M 1,596]

Yes, you are a Tory.

 

A typical died-in-the-wool Tory who is so obviously never going to change his views no matter what argument is put before him, therefore it would be pointless trying to discuss anything with you.

 

'Ted' has been on this Forum under a different guise. I can spot the signs

[willman 10]

If cutbacks are necessary, then we should cutback on buying weapons/building bombs/'war on drugs' etc, well before cutting health, welfare and benefits.

 

That's an admirable way to think however some people think that the war on drugs and the development of pawn countries is more important to welfare and benefits.

[Jonny5 10]

Yes, you are a Tory.

 

A typical died-in-the-wool Tory who is so obviously never going to change his views no matter what argument is put before him, therefore it would be pointless trying to discuss anything with you.

That's astonishingly rich coming from you.