Jump to content

Could Corbyn sue Cameron for slander after todays speech

Recommended Posts

I've just been watching Camerons speech today in which he refers to Corbyn as "Terrorist sympathising" and it got me wondering whether MP's are allowed to sue each other if comments like that are untrue or if they have some sort of priveledges which prevents this.

 

I'm also curious to know the basis of this statement as it's a pretty odious statement about someone if untrue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you think he would have said it if so, given all his advisers etc ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's just plain daft, so he can say what he wants and the recipient of the attack can do nothing about it.

 

Oh what a wonderful democracy we have!

 

---------- Post added 07-10-2015 at 16:49 ----------

 

Do you think he would have said it if so, given all his advisers etc ?

 

I don't know, it's very harsh if not true and from reviewing some of his speeches on the net I cannot see any evidence that he's a "terrorst sympathiser".

 

Happy to be proved wrong though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That's just plain daft, so he can say what he wants and the recipient of the attack can do nothing about it.

 

Oh what a wonderful democracy we have!

 

---------- Post added 07-10-2015 at 16:49 ----------

 

 

I don't know, it's very harsh if not true and from reviewing some of his speeches on the net I cannot see any evidence that he's a "terrorst sympathiser".

 

Happy to be proved wrong though.

 

I'm no fan of Cameron but imagine he can back it up or he wouldn't have said such a thing, he's no idiot....well kind of;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just search for MR COrbyns friends - these include Sinn Fein, Hezbollah, he's had excursions paid for by banned terroist groups and proudly supports Hammas.

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/labour/11749043/Andrew-Gilligan-Jeremy-Corbyn-friend-to-Hamas-Iran-and-extremists.html

 

It's an interesting article but most people would interpret the phrase "terrorist sympathiser" as someone who supported the killing and maiming of innocent people and there's nowhere that indicates he does.

 

I suggest it's perfectly reasonable to want the same outcome as these groups but not to support the killing of innocent people to achieve this.

 

I hope he gets the opportunity to clarify this issue with the public.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

to call Corbyn 'terrorist sympathising', at least in the past if not right now at this very moment, is probably not untrue at al. If it is untrue, then why hasn't Corbyn sued the numerous newspapers who have printed that he is 'terrorist sympathising', for libel?

 

I wonder if anybody would be able to sue Corbyn and Mcdonnell for claiming that they are 'peace campaigners' ? When nobody has ever seen either of them on a platform with Israelis, or Ulster Unionists, but just Hamas, Hizbullah, Sinn Fein and the IRA?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's an interesting article but most people would interpret the phrase "terrorist sympathiser" as someone who supported the killing and maiming of innocent people and there's nowhere that indicates he does.

 

I suggest it's perfectly reasonable to want the same outcome as these groups but not to support the killing of innocent people to achieve this.

 

I hope he gets the opportunity to clarify this issue with the public.

 

He's a man that would gladly discuss with and promote the ideas of organisations and people that have deeply racist, homophobic, violent and extremist ideas in the guise of 'international co-operation'. He's either genuinely an idiot and believes everything that comes out of the mouth of anyone in opposition to the Government, or is extremely good at only seeing what he wants to see.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've just been watching Camerons speech today in which he refers to Corbyn as "Terrorist sympathising" and it got me wondering whether MP's are allowed to sue each other if comments like that are untrue or if they have some sort of priveledges which prevents this.

 

I'm also curious to know the basis of this statement as it's a pretty odious statement about someone if untrue.

 

it isn't slander if it is true. so it is fine to call the yorkshire ripper a murderer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interestingly the United Nations General Assembly uses the following definition:

 

“Criminal acts intended or calculated to provoke a state of terror in the public”

 

From looking at Jeremy Corbyn he doesn’t strike me as someone who would sympathise with this viewpoint, and if there is any justice left in our democracy he should be able to demand an apology from Cameron.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.