Jump to content
We’re excited to announce the forum is under new management! Details to follow.

Were the moon landings fake?

Recommended Posts

theres a section about spilling orange juice onto the camera from inside their suit which is a new one to me, might not be?

 

Too many problems with that video.

 

The swinging bag will swing like that in a very low atmosphere and gravity as it has no resistance to encounter. Same with the so called waving flag from previous videos that continued to wave as if a wind is on it. In any-case no one has yet explained (if it was all a fake) just how the retro reflectors got there as they were placed on its surface. Those are still being used today to measure the moons distance from earth by anyone who knows their position. They simply cant have just been dumped remotely as they need to be positioned to operate correctly.

 

As for the orange juice, I was always under the impression that when they returned to the craft to sleep that the craft was re-pressurised. The oxygen supply capability in the suits would not have lasted for a week or so otherwise. According to the official NASA sources, from Apollo 15 onward the astronauts could remove their suits, so it was possible that orange juice could have been spilt as this was Apollo 16 that this supposedly happened.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the best space conspiracy story in a long time:

 

Nasa does not have a colony of child sex slaves on Mars, it has been forced to confirm.

The space agency has looked to address claims made by a guest on Alex Jones's Infowars channel that it has kidnapped children and is holding them on Mars.

 

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/nasa-mars-child-sex-slave-colony-space-agency-alex-jones-infowars-robert-david-steele-a7816371.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please can the 'conspiracy theorist' who states that there is a colony on Mars tell the 'conspiracy theorist' who thinks the Earth is flat that when they look back from Mars the Earth is round and has crescent of light.

 

Can they tell the 'conspiracy theorist' who thinks the Earth is at the centre of the Universe that the Earth gets bigger and smaller as it moves around the Sun.

 

Can they also tell the 'conspiracy theorist' who thinks it was to difficult to get to the Moon that travelling hundreds of times further is easy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Moon had already been visited see alternative 3.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The Moon had already been visited see alternative 3.

:huh:

Hmmm...

 

Indeed... and

! :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Go to the sea and put a see thru ruler a inch from your eyes and line the ruler up with the horizon.

 

Now look 50 miles to the right and another 50 miles or as far as you can see to the left.

 

The horizon will never,ever drop a millimetre below the ruler.....

 

You ball earthers have been well and truly had.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nasa does not have a colony of child sex slaves on Mars

 

If there are no children there can we also assume there is no wife on Mars?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Go to the sea and put a see thru ruler a inch from your eyes and line the ruler up with the horizon.

 

Now look 50 miles to the right and another 50 miles or as far as you can see to the left.

 

The horizon will never,ever drop a millimetre below the ruler.....

 

You ball earthers have been well and truly had.

 

So if I get a powerful enough telescope I should be able to see Australia, cool..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Go to the sea and put a see thru ruler a inch from your eyes and line the ruler up with the horizon.

 

Now look 50 miles to the right and another 50 miles or as far as you can see to the left.

 

The horizon will never,ever drop a millimetre below the ruler.....

 

You ball earthers have been well and truly had.

 

I have gone '...to the sea...' many times. There is not a ship in the world that you can see a sea horizon anywhere near 50 miles away- you would need to be at jet plane cruising altitude. The distance you can see is dependent on height above sea level (and little on the effect of heat differentials).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Line from the song I posted a few days ago.....

 

 

 

Don't be fooled by perspective tricks - it's your limited vision hiding those ships.

 

 

 

 

Get a pair of binoculars and the ship will reappear again.

 

Then when it disappears once more,get a good telescope and again it will reappear - proving its not due to any curvature of the earth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Line from the song I posted a few days ago.....

 

 

 

Don't be fooled by perspective tricks - it's your limited vision hiding those ships.

 

 

 

 

Get a pair of binoculars and the ship will reappear again.

 

Then when it disappears once more,get a good telescope and again it will reappear - proving its not due to any curvature of the earth.

 

Luckily this "conspiracy theory" does not work at sea.

 

To cope with the limited abilities of our vision, various forms of radar have been found to be very useful. Radar does not need glasses, night vision, binoculars, telescopes, etc. The distance a radar device can see depends on its height above the surface and corresponds exactly to the curvature of the Earth away from it.

 

That's a very good reason for putting the radar device as high as possible on a ship.

 

How thick is a "conspiracy theorists" manual?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Luckily this "conspiracy theory" does not work at sea.

 

To cope with the limited abilities of our vision, various forms of radar have been found to be very useful. Radar does not need glasses, night vision, binoculars, telescopes, etc. The distance a radar device can see depends on its height above the surface and corresponds exactly to the curvature of the Earth away from it.

 

That's a very good reason for putting the radar device as high as possible on a ship.

 

How thick is a "conspiracy theorists" manual?

:huh:

Hmmm... I'm guessing...

 

... not as thick as it's reader! :suspect:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.