Jump to content

VIP paedophile ring

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
On 18/05/2019 at 23:35, Longcol said:

But in all the years you've contributed to the likes of the Princess Di & David Kelly threads I can't ever recall you linking to the actual inquest papers (or linking to anything else for that matter)  - only repeating allegations found in the more dodgy tabloids that both were murdered.

I followed the transcripts of Diana's inquest daily at the time, (as I've mentioned before.)

 

What struck me most was the presses attempt to smear/ vilify  certain witnesses. The images the press tried to convey to the general public bore no resemblance to the people appearing in court to give evidence, nor what was said. The missreporting was scandalous.

Edited by Anna B

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Anna B said:

I followed the transcripts of Diana's inquest daily at the time, (as I've mentioned before.)

 

What struck me most was the presses attempt to smear/ vilify  certain witnesses. The images the press tried to convey to the general public bore no resemblance to the people appearing in court to give evidence, nor what was said. The missreporting was scandalous.

How do you know? You weren't there in court. How things appear in a plain transcript doesn't give a clue to the emphasis the witness may have given to certain words - whether they sounded sincere, shifty, condescending etc. You can't tell if they were making eye contact with other people or staring at the ground or into space. You can't see their body language.

 

Have you ever interviewed anyone for a job? It isn't just what is said, it's the way that it's said - and the non-verbal clues that are equally as important if not more so.

 

And yes, numerous times you've said you read inquests - but you've never linked to one and say a press report to show how they contradicted each other. You have gone along with some of the more fanciful "conspiracy theories" based on next to nothing - if I recall you thought Mohammed Al-Fayed a credible witness even though his QC admitted that they hadn't a shred of evidence to back up his allegations.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.