VIP paedophile ring

[Anna B 1,401]

On 18/05/2019 at 23:35, Longcol said:

But in all the years you've contributed to the likes of the Princess Di & David Kelly threads I can't ever recall you linking to the actual inquest papers (or linking to anything else for that matter)  - only repeating allegations found in the more dodgy tabloids that both were murdered.

I followed the transcripts of Diana's inquest daily at the time, (as I've mentioned before.)

 

What struck me most was the presses attempt to smear/ vilify  certain witnesses. The images the press tried to convey to the general public bore no resemblance to the people appearing in court to give evidence, nor what was said. The missreporting was scandalous.

Edited May 20, 2019 by Anna B

[Longcol 598]

6 hours ago, Anna B said:

I followed the transcripts of Diana's inquest daily at the time, (as I've mentioned before.)

 

What struck me most was the presses attempt to smear/ vilify  certain witnesses. The images the press tried to convey to the general public bore no resemblance to the people appearing in court to give evidence, nor what was said. The missreporting was scandalous.

How do you know? You weren't there in court. How things appear in a plain transcript doesn't give a clue to the emphasis the witness may have given to certain words - whether they sounded sincere, shifty, condescending etc. You can't tell if they were making eye contact with other people or staring at the ground or into space. You can't see their body language.

 

Have you ever interviewed anyone for a job? It isn't just what is said, it's the way that it's said - and the non-verbal clues that are equally as important if not more so.

 

And yes, numerous times you've said you read inquests - but you've never linked to one and say a press report to show how they contradicted each other. You have gone along with some of the more fanciful "conspiracy theories" based on next to nothing - if I recall you thought Mohammed Al-Fayed a credible witness even though his QC admitted that they hadn't a shred of evidence to back up his allegations.

[the_bloke 17]

On 25/11/2016 at 00:06, Anna B said:

I would love to see 'Nick' to come to court charged with perverting the course of justice. I'd really like to hear what he has to say.

 

I would put money on the fact it will never happen, because their main aim is to keep the victims, especially 'Nick,' out of court at all costs in case they blow the enquiry wide open.

Turns out it was a complete fantasy made up by a convicted paedophile which cost the tax payer millions.

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-49074879

 

How sure are you now of your previous claims?

[Lockdoctor 10]

Today's verdict  against Carl Beech will bring doubt about whether the verdicts against many people convicted of recent historic sexual offences are really guilty.

[bendix 10]

1 hour ago, the_bloke said:

Turns out it was a complete fantasy made up by a convicted paedophile which cost the tax payer millions.

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-49074879

 

How sure are you now of your previous claims?

What does it matter?  We live in an age where people simply 'believing' something to be true, makes it true.  Anna B, who seems to have a bit of a bent for these nonsense conspiracies, will dismiss today's conviction as some kind of coverup, which, bizarrely, will convince here even more that there is some kind of high profile pedo ring operating.

 

It's today's mindset.  Proof no longer matters.  People think simply having their stupid ideas makes them necessarily true.

 

Side-note:  I posted yesterday about how it is always right wing nutjobs who believe these kind of conspiracy theories.  Add this story to the list.  I don't know why the far right are so obsessed with pedos and suspected pedos. It's all a bit weird.

[Eater Sundae 12]

After all the damage he has done, I hope the sentence is appropriate 

[Longcol 598]

2 hours ago, bendix said:

Side-note:  I posted yesterday about how it is always right wing nutjobs who believe these kind of conspiracy theories.  Add this story to the list.  I don't know why the far right are so obsessed with pedos and suspected pedos. It's all a bit weird.

Perhaps so they have people they can feel superior to?

[Top Cats Hat 10]

4 hours ago, Lockdoctor said:

Today's verdict  against Carl Beech will bring doubt about whether the verdicts against many people convicted of recent historic sexual offences are really guilty.

It won’t bring any doubt at all, given that they were all convicted on solid evidence.

[Lex Luthor 10]

On 22/07/2019 at 21:27, Eater Sundae said:

After all the damage he has done, I hope the sentence is appropriate 

I wonder how many victims of repeated child rape could actually be accepted as credible witnesses in adulthood.  

[hobinfoot 25]

Beech was sentenced to 18 years today. He was found guilty on several charges including downloading child pornography. He is a lying fantasist who tried to cover his own crimes by accusing others. People like him do untold damage to real victims who will now wonder if it’s worth reporting crimes carried out against them.