taxman   12 #13 Posted January 27, 2015 If someone is brown, would they object to being called black?  Who decides which term is acceptable/offensive at any given time? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
onenerveleft   10 #14 Posted January 27, 2015 If someone is brown, would they object to being called black? Who decides which term is acceptable/offensive at any given time?  Exactly.  Im going for differentially pigmented until I'm given a full colour chart with terms. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Bill Plant   10 #15 Posted January 27, 2015 I used the word coloured once when describing a black person and my friend said black is the correct word to use as we are not coloured like a rainbow. It is not only bored out of touch white folk who get offended by the word coloured.  Never said it was mate.  ---------- Post added 27-01-2015 at 23:52 ----------  Exactly.  Im going for differentially pigmented until I'm given a full colour chart with terms.  I just use the white brown black yellow colour scheme. I dont go in for all these name changes due to some wallflowers sensitivities. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
barleycorn   10 #16 Posted January 28, 2015 Technically this is mostly true due to a lack of pigment in the skin. It's been a while since I did biology though  Surely the only people who lack pigment are albinos. 'White' people have pigment, that's why they go brown in the sun (or red, depending on your skin type).  jb  ---------- Post added 28-01-2015 at 14:07 ----------  Exactly.  Im going for differentially pigmented until I'm given a full colour chart with terms.  Perhaps the Fitzpatrick Scale would suffice?  jb Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
tzijlstra   11 #17 Posted January 28, 2015 Surely the only people who lack pigment are albinos. 'White' people have pigment, that's why they go brown in the sun (or red, depending on your skin type).  jb  ---------- Post added 28-01-2015 at 14:07 ----------   Perhaps the Fitzpatrick Scale would suffice?  jb  I'm such a type 1/2 crossover, I find that scale offensive because it has no in between category Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Vaati   11 #18 Posted January 28, 2015 I said this in the other thread:  I'm not a colour - I'm a person. I am not defined by my skin tone, hair colour, eye colour etc. I'm just 'me' and that is all I ever will be.  Eff colour etc! We are who we are. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
cressida   1,551 #19 Posted January 28, 2015 (edited) I've found that the word 'coloured' is used less and less, I always say 'black' as the word 'coloured' makes me think of crayons.  black, white is a straightforward and simple way of describing people, people who are black on hearing themselves being referred to as 'coloured' may not be certain the speaker wasn't being offensive. Edited January 28, 2015 by cressida Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
tinfoilhat   11 #20 Posted January 28, 2015 What about all the ones inbetween - which Sherlock I think was trying to include in his ham fisted way when he was talking about diversity (or lack off) in Hollywood. That's how I read it anyway. That or he thinks there are plenty of Asian, Hispanic etc actors in Hollywood and there just aren't enough black ones. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Guest   #21 Posted January 29, 2015 Not if it's Christa Ackroyd  Or David Dickinson. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Ms Macbeth   73 #22 Posted January 29, 2015 I I said this in the other thread: I'm not a colour - I'm a person. I am not defined by my skin tone, hair colour, eye colour etc. I'm just 'me' and that is all I ever will be.  Eff colour etc! We are who we are.  You might not think you are defined by how you look but ithe way each of us looks is important when a description is needed. Being described as 'an elderly woman' in my case wouldn't help anyone trying to identify me. However being described as 'an older white woman of average height, with glasses and white hair' could pick me out.  Benedict Cumberbatch went over the top with his apology, his intention was not to be offensive as most sensible folk would realise. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Solomon1   10 #23 Posted January 29, 2015 OMG! I am so confused now. I honestly thought 'coloured' was a perfectly acceptable word to describe a black person??? I hope I've never unknowingly ever offended anyone by using this term. I feel bad now  Don't feel bad dude. It wasn't done out of malice and you are willing to be educated, that's all that matters  ---------- Post added 29-01-2015 at 13:32 ----------  If someone is brown, would they object to being called black? Who decides which term is acceptable/offensive at any given time?  The individual and the collective  ---------- Post added 29-01-2015 at 13:36 ----------  I just use the white brown black yellow colour scheme. I dont go in for all these name changes due to some wallflowers sensitivities  Working class, council estate born and bred? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Susil   10 #24 Posted February 1, 2015 Apparently it is De rigueur to say "people of colour" but a serious faux pas to say "coloured" (go figure).   A big part of the problem lies in the difference between the history of Britain and the US. Bear in mind that in the states, segregation is still within living memory for some. The word "coloured" was regularly used in segregated areas (signs saying "no coloured" and whatnot) so it carries those connotations in the US that it doesn't really have over here. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...