Julie Dore to stand down ?

[bullerboY 10]

Dennis is a top man who has done me a good turn in the past But ! he has two sports coats.

 

---------- Post added 06-12-2014 at 23:50 ----------

 

She got me a free drink in the tent on Pinstone Street when the city centre cycling was on , top lass.

I bet you wont get one off your sparing partner Ron Clayton

 

---------- Post added 07-12-2014 at 13:29 ----------

 

Thats the problem Detective,it is no longer a democracy and dont hold your breathe take a look at Rotherham.

 

---------- Post added 07-12-2014 at 13:32 ----------

 

There was a time before Labour took control of the council when My Lord Scriven was in charge.

"’Biggest step forward’ for Sheffield’s £600m Sevenstone retail site, says Scriven"

http://www.thestar.co.uk/news/business/business-news/biggest-step-forward-for-sheffield-s-600m-sevenstone-retail-site-says-scriven-1-3182672

I think you will find it was not Julie Dore to blame, just do a search for Sheffield Sevenstones and you may well find that Paul Scriven was the man behind the project.

If we want a leader with charisma and also photogenic in front of a camera, come back Baron Scriven of Hunters Bar, leader of Sheffield Council 2008-11.

There rests my case

I never said she was to blame.

[Anna B 1,414]

Can I recommend that anyone that wishes to criticise, tries to learn bit about what powers and decisions making rights our Councillors actually have.

It isn't easy to get to the bottom of it, but writing to Ms Dore might be a good start.

 

So much of Local Government and Administration is controlled by nationally implemented laws and regulations. Because of this and the complexity of it all, much of the control is in the hands of the unelected officers, the Chief Executive etc.

 

"Yes, Minister" was not far off the mark in both National & Local Government.

 

I agree totally, but why is it so difficult to find things out?

Shouldn't the workings of the council be 'transparent'?

 

They make a show of being 'transparent' but in actuallity nothing could be further from the truth.

[cgksheff 44]

I agree totally, but why is it so difficult to find things out?

Shouldn't the workings of the council be 'transparent'?

 

They make a show of being 'transparent' but in actuallity nothing could be further from the truth.

 

A general attitude seems to pervade the Sheffield administration that they are all doing us a favour and we should not interfere with their cushy numbers.

 

The classic attitude of planners that we are all to thick to understand what they do springs to mind.

 

They are there to serve our needs, but by keeping things obscure, they can keep the upper hand.

 

I have had experience of intensively researching some relevant regulations and guidelines ... and then being able to run rings round them.

They don't like it, you know!

[cuttsie 1,090]

I bet you wont get one off your sparing partner Ron Clayton

 

---------- Post added 07-12-2014 at 13:29 ----------

 

Thats the problem Detective,it is no longer a democracy and dont hold your breathe take a look at Rotherham.

 

---------- Post added 07-12-2014 at 13:32 ----------

 

I never said she was to blame.

Ron Clayton [sheffield's prince Charles . and myself are good buddies ,we disagree on the Markets area but are kindred spirits on many aspects in life.

Keep thi hands of the Tower Ron or we will lock thi up in it

[Penistone999 10]

All before Julie Dore's time.

 

The point is the person who i quoted is blaming the government for SCC`s mismanagement and sheer incompetence. I was merely listing some of SCC`s major "mistakes" over the years and wondering how someone can say the government is to blame for balls up`s made in sheffield town hall.

 

---------- Post added 07-12-2014 at 16:59 ----------

 

A general attitude seems to pervade the Sheffield administration that they are all doing us a favour and we should not interfere with their cushy numbers.

 

The classic attitude of planners that we are all to thick to understand what they do springs to mind.

They are there to serve our needs, but by keeping things obscure, they can keep the upper hand.

 

I have had experience of intensively researching some relevant regulations and guidelines ... and then being able to run rings round them.

They don't like it, you know!

 

 

Money talks .

[Anna B 1,414]

A general attitude seems to pervade the Sheffield administration that they are all doing us a favour and we should not interfere with their cushy numbers.

 

The classic attitude of planners that we are all to thick to understand what they do springs to mind.

 

They are there to serve our needs, but by keeping things obscure, they can keep the upper hand.

 

I have had experience of intensively researching some relevant regulations and guidelines ... and then being able to run rings round them.

They don't like it, you know!

 

That is certainly the impression they give.

 

Wouldn't it be nice to have a couple of councillors on Sheffield Forum weighing in with their version of things.

[bazjea 10]

 

---------- Post added 06-12-2014 at 22:56 ----------

 

 

Insults?.....

 

---------- Post added 06-12-2014 at 23:13 ----------

 

Funny how you are not old enough to go in a pub.

 

But in an earlier post thought a bank would not give a 22 year old a loan

 

If you must post statistics, at least do some research of official documents to

back up your post

 

Quote Rivaldo

"what bank would give 22 yeard old a loan,none that i know at all "[/

 

Over 25 where i am , i don't drink so i don't go in "pubs"

 

an i do my research. plenty thanks

 

I honestly do not know what you are on about.

 

First you are 22 years old and won't be able to get a loan

Then you are not old enough to go in a pub

Finally you are (Quote) "Over 25 where i am". Whatever that means.

[cgksheff 44]

 

First you are 22 years old and won't be able to get a loan

Then you are not old enough to go in a pub

Finally you are (Quote) "Over 25 where i am". Whatever that means.

 

The implication is that the poster lives in a place where the minimum age for public consumption of alcohol is 25 years.

That would place them in one of 5 Indian States.

 

Yeah. Right!

[bazjea 10]

The implication is that the poster lives in a place where the minimum age for public consumption of alcohol is 25 years.

That would place them in one of 5 Indian States.

 

Yeah. Right!

 

Thanks for that.

I knew someone would be able to solve the riddle.

 

i will not ask you try to work out which of the Indian states it

would be,that would be asking too much.

Maybe he will tell us.

[ormester101 10]

best news i have heard a inept council leader that couldnt do her job is leaving

[clinteastwoo 10]

Is she actually standing down ?

 

Its no good getting us all wound up and she ends up staying.

[Penistone999 10]

That is certainly the impression they give.

 

Wouldn't it be nice to have a couple of councillors on Sheffield Forum weighing in with their version of things.

 

 

They would only tow the party line and trot out the same old cobblers they do in the media.