Mecky   10 #49 Posted September 7, 2014 What if? Is that your arguement? Ok, what if Hitler had won, or King Harold, you can what if till the cows come home inluding , what if you had voted Tory instead of for the incompetents of the left that you dont have the imagination to ignore.  THE FACT IS Labour were in power, the buck stops with them and with you who support them.  ---------- Post added 07-09-2014 at 12:17 ----------   incomprehensible.  Alright then, I'll remember that when you try it next ... and you will  ---------- Post added 07-09-2014 at 16:49 ----------  And if Labour had been in power now what would the accounts look like?  Better than they do now, why? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
James Gold   10 #50 Posted September 7, 2014 Tony has no shame whatsoever Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Alan Ladd   10 #51 Posted September 8, 2014 Alright then, I'll remember that when you try it next ... and you will ---------- Post added 07-09-2014 at 16:49 ----------   Better than they do now, why?  When I try what? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
truman   10 #52 Posted September 8, 2014  Better than they do now, why?  How would they have achieved that? Genuine question... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Alan Ladd   10 #53 Posted September 8, 2014 How would they have achieved that? Genuine question...   Do you ever get the impression he isn't very well? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Mecky   10 #54 Posted September 8, 2014 How would they have achieved that? Genuine question...  I guess they wouldn't have borrowed more in 3 years than the tories. From Elsewhere (Not my words).  1140.stewing "The rebuttal of neils 'Labour ruined our economy' is another sign that people are beginning to see through to the neo-liberal claptrap. It is a fact that only two Labour governments have left power with national debts (as a percentage of GDP) greater than those they inherited.1931&2010 both a time of global financial crises. Osborne increased the debt by more in 3 years than Labour did in 13"  Ref: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-29103503 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
truman   10 #55 Posted September 8, 2014 I guess they wouldn't have borrowed more in 3 years than the tories.   And how would they have managed that ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Mecky   10 #56 Posted September 8, 2014 And how would they have managed that ?  By borrowing less in 13 years than the tories did in 3. Now, that's all I'm going to say on the matter because we are digressing off topic Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Alan Ladd   10 #57 Posted September 8, 2014 By borrowing less in 13 years than the tories did in 3. Now, that's all I'm going to say on the matter because we are digressing off topic  Probably the least said the better about how wonderfully well the Labour party handled the countries economy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
