Paying for sex debate has reached Radio 4

[Coutts 10]

No, in your case it is racist as you specifically said a Ting Tong from Thailand. If you'd said a Ting Tong from somewhere it wouldn't have been racist.

 

Can we all please stop saying ting tong. Thank you.

 

BACK ON TOPIC, as I mentioned in a previous post, when it comes to sex, however men choose to pay for it, whether through marriage, girlfriends, mistresses or sex "specialist", the standard of woman in a man's bed will ALWAYS be reflected in how much money he earns. So interestingly some men of low means choose to hop on a plane to Thailand to finally enjoy the fruits that rich men have been enjoying over here. Proof that what I say is correct. Otherwise, they would save on the plane ticket.

 

---------- Post added 22-08-2014 at 14:44 ----------

 

Paying is such a non subject, you have to pay in some way. It is freebies and paying too much with clauses which should be talked about.

 

Tell us more!

[ronthenekred 10]

No, in your case it is racist as you specifically said a Ting Tong from Thailand. If you'd said a Ting Tong from somewhere it wouldn't have been racist.

 

Oh really?

 

You make a snide unfounded observation about my relationships then add "Thai bride" as a perceived insult which is already covered in another thread, which you could have took there. What seems to be happening here is the possible attempt at getting both threads closed because you are both outed ignoramus meatheads. Keep the significance to the threads concerned rather than overlapping.

[Zamo 10]

As a matter of principle I have nothing against people trading sex. Problem is the issue of coercion and exploitation, which make it much more of a grey area.

 

Coutts - Didn't think it was possible for another man to have such strong views about woman that on the misogynist scale I'm actually closer to Germaine Greer. Wow... just wow.

[rickiethecat 10]

Oh really?

 

You make a snide unfounded observation about my relationships then add "Thai bride" as a perceived insult which is already covered in another thread, which you could have took there. What seems to be happening here is the possible attempt at getting both threads closed because you are both outed ignoramus meatheads. Keep the significance to the threads concerned rather than overlapping.

 

Just pointing out your hypocrisy in calling people racist in another thread then using a racist term in this one. Even if it was a crude attempt at humour you're still implying that young women from Thailand will only marry a man if he provides for them in return, which is not just racist but sexist also.

[Coutts 10]

Coutts - Didn't think it was possible for another man to have such strong views about woman that on the misogynist scale I'm actually closer to Germaine Greer. Wow... just wow.

 

I'm not a misogynist in the slightest. I just don't need a woman for anything other than sex. Nor does any other man. Maybe you would like to enlighten me as to why I might need a woman for anything other than sex? What could a woman possibly bring to the table that I need other than sex?

 

Women need men for many things, men only need women for sex. I didn't make the laws of nature. I'm just pointing them out. This isn't an opinion, it's FACT! Don't shoot the messenger. I'm surprised you guys don't get it. And that will only end in tears for you. But don't worry, when it does, me and Rickiethecat will be here to help you get back on the horse.

[Zamo 10]

I'm not a misogynist in the slightest. I just don't need a woman for anything other than sex. Nor does any other man. Maybe you would like to enlighten me as to why I might need a woman for anything other than sex? What could a woman possibly bring to the table that I need other than sex?

 

Women need men for many things, men only need women for sex. I didn't make the laws of nature. I'm just pointing them out. This isn't an opinion, it's FACT! Don't shoot the messenger. I'm surprised you guys don't get it. And that will only end in tears for you. But don't worry, when it does, me and Rickiethecat will be here to help you get back on the horse.

 

Washing, ironing, cooking, looking after the kids? Try to think out of the box Coutts and stop being such a sexist.

[ronthenekred 10]

Just pointing out your hypocrisy in calling people racist in another thread then using a racist term in this one. Even if it was a crude attempt at humour you're still implying that young women from Thailand will only marry a man if he provides for them in return, which is not just racist but sexist also.

 

Replied to in other thread.

[Coutts 10]

Washing, ironing, cooking,

 

Exactly, love it. Good jokes Zamo.

 

But to address the point, a man can wash, iron and cook for himself you know, or he can pay minimum wage for a cleaner to come over for a couple of hours twice a week. This maid will save him tens of thousands over time compared with the cost of a wife. Do the maths, makes perfect sense. Why pay your wife what for most men will equate to £100's an hour over the years to NOT clean the house properly when you can simply pay minimum wage and give a nice girl some work. And when was the last time your wife had a nice steak on the table when you came home from work? EXACTLY!

 

looking after the kids?

 

You are totally taking the pi$$ now. No man in the history of the universe has ever dreamed as a kid of getting married and having children unless he bats for the other side. Men don't want children, they just stupidly agree to having children or get suckered in to having them. Children are the ultimate disaster. You want to know real pain, have children, live the child support dream.

 

Do you know that the cost to raise the average child from 0-25 years old is generally around £250,000+ per child. No wonder the average Joe is poor for life! What with the demands of his wife and kids not to mention the mortgage and utilities, car payments and everything else, his life is literally an endless treadmill to an early grave. That's why women live longer. Don't you lot know anything! Honestly. And he got into this mess simply because he wanted sex. And now he gets no sex. He gave up all his hopes, dreams, his life for NO sex.

[mart 71]

Couttsy, I agree with a lot of what you have said in this thread. I can understand the bitterness of other posters against what you are saying because the truth hurts. You will have just sent loads of blokes in to depression, because they have just realised that the last 30 odd years or more of their lives have been a big mistake I can understand your lifestyle and I don’t make judgement at all. (In actual fact, your life seems similar to mine in some ways).

 

Regarding women paying for sex though, to clarify, the majority do not have to-I agree, it is a choice for various reasons of the women, but a small minority do actually pay for sex, it is a fact. Of the women that pay for sex, the majority of them could go and get sex for free of course.

 

I also concur about men stuck in sexless relationships/marriages-another fact, and perhaps one they are perhaps not happy talking about. Maybe because it is akin to keeping a dog and barking yourself Often men are seen as a meal ticket. Also correct Couttsy about the cost of keeping a woman, far more than going out once a week and paying for sex directly. I guess lots of men are in comfort zones.

[Chris_Sleeps 10]

No man in the history of the universe has ever dreamed as a kid of getting married and having children unless he bats for the other side.

 

Coutts is quite obviously Manofstrad. This topic has been well and truly derailed.

[ronthenekred 10]

 

Coutts is quite obviously Manofstrad. This topic has been well and truly derailed.

 

Is that a euphemism for a 5'2" 21stone follically challenged comb over bedsit deadbeat from Strad?

 

---------- Post added 22-08-2014 at 16:16 ----------

 

Couttsy, I agree with a lot of what you have said in this thread. I can understand the bitterness of other posters against what you are saying because the truth hurts. You will have just sent loads of blokes in to depression, because they have just realised that the last 30 odd years or more of their lives have been a big mistake I can understand your lifestyle and I don’t make judgement at all. (In actual fact, your life seems similar to mine in some ways).

 

Regarding women paying for sex though, to clarify, the majority do not have to-I agree, it is a choice for various reasons of the women, but a small minority do actually pay for sex, it is a fact. Of the women that pay for sex, the majority of them could go and get sex for free of course.

 

I also concur about men stuck in sexless relationships/marriages-another fact, and perhaps one they are perhaps not happy talking about. Maybe because it is akin to keeping a dog and barking yourself Often men are seen as a meal ticket. Also correct Couttsy about the cost of keeping a woman, far more than going out once a week and paying for sex directly. I guess lots of men are in comfort zones.

 

True, women can end up with low achievers who do sweet fa apart from keep the TV warm while the woman is out usually struggling trying to keep it together. Initially it's chocs and flowers and running around like a demented sexual retard..that wears off after a few weeks of watching porn they then expect gymnastics while themselves unable to lift a buttock because it weighs the same as a 50Kg bag of spuds. Nothing like describing a monochrome one sided picture is there.

[Coutts 10]

 

Coutts is quite obviously Manofstrad. This topic has been well and truly derailed.

 

This is sheffield forum, get with the program. I'm not Manofstrad, how many times. I don't even think he comes here anymore.

 

I also concur about men stuck in sexless relationships/marriages-another fact, and perhaps one they are perhaps not happy talking about. Maybe because it is akin to keeping a dog and barking yourself Often men are seen as a meal ticket. Also correct Couttsy about the cost of keeping a woman, far more than going out once a week and paying for sex directly. I guess lots of men are in comfort zones.

 

I should say, I don't pay a sex "specialist" for sex, I will never indulge in illegal prostitution. Mainly because I don't want to risk the sudden and immediate need to rush to a clinic. I'm not saying that every sex worker has, "trouble down there", but the fear of that is enough for me. I certainly would never judge any man that chose to use an escort. More power to him, but don't forget to rubber up guys! Lets stay safe out there!

 

But yes mart, men are seen as a meal ticket which isn't surprising as women have very few options! This is why I am not a misogynist, because I understand the game women have to play and I don't blame them, it's just that I'm not going to play it with them and will always alert my fellow man to their tricks. Women have no choice but to play the game because that's all they have. We are all on this earth to get as much out of life as possible. But for one person to win, the other person has to lose. This isn't the 1950's, there is no more happy ever after love. This is the era of social media. Social media is responsible for 1000's of divorces every year. Any man who thinks he's going to remain in a happy ever after marriage with a faithful and loyal wife, better think again. Which means divorce, ALIMONY and child support. Say goodbye to your wallet forever. Most men don't even understand the concept of spousal support, maintenance. Read up on it guys, then see if you still think it's a good idea to get married. A terrible way to pay for your sex that could end up costing you everything.

Edited August 22, 2014 by Coutts