No User Name   10 #85 Posted August 6, 2014 https://web.archive.org/web/20021209110405/http://www.chestertri.org.uk/friar02_results.htm  Malcolm Cottam Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Eater Sundae   12 #86 Posted August 6, 2014 No User Name. Good find, but I think you should delete your post until it is confirmed. And of course pass on what you have found. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
No User Name   10 #87 Posted August 6, 2014 No User Name. Good find, but I think you should delete your post until it is confirmed. And of course pass on what you have found.  Why? Its all over the BBC Local Live ticker (I cant claim the credit for finding it, it's on there)  http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-derbyshire-28655390 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Hinzy9   10 #88 Posted August 6, 2014 https://web.archive.org/web/20021209110405/http://www.chestertri.org.uk/friar02_results.htm Malcolm Cottam  Perhaps the police hadn't explored it after all..... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Eater Sundae   12 #89 Posted August 6, 2014 Why? Its all over the BBC Local Live ticker (I cant claim the credit for finding it, it's on there) http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-derbyshire-28655390  Oh, I see, sorry. It looked like you'd found the race result Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
No User Name   10 #90 Posted August 6, 2014 Oh, I see, sorry. It looked like you'd found the race result  Nah, Im not that clever  Although I did look for the other one after finding that on the BBC website (the Barnsley one) and no traces of it. Was 24 years ago, mind.  Perhaps the police hadn't explored it after all.....  Utterly staggering if they hadnt. Basic stuff, this. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Eater Sundae   12 #91 Posted August 6, 2014 (edited) Perhaps the police hadn't explored it after all.....  It looks a bit like that, doesn't it. A pretty obvious and easy to follow up clue, you would think.  Incredible if they hadn't.  Edit. it's nearly a week since he was killed, and only now are the triathlon links brought up. Edited August 6, 2014 by Eater Sundae Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
F. Sidebottom   10 #92 Posted August 6, 2014 (edited) The thing you have to be careful of here is the assumption that he wore that helmet and race number for that race. He may have bought that helmet from a charity shop with the sticker on. Imagine the initial reaction of the family of tri-athlete 100 of the Friar Tuck 2002 triathlon, if people spread the word on social media that he is deceased, and it turned out not to be him. Edited August 6, 2014 by F. Sidebottom Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
No User Name   10 #93 Posted August 6, 2014 (edited) The thing you have to be careful of here is the assumption that he wore that helmet and race number for that race. He may have bought that helmet from a charity shop with the sticker on. Imagine the initial reaction of the family of tri-athlete 100 of the Friar Tuck 2002 triathlon (Malcom Cottam), if people spread the word on social media that he is deceased, and it turned out not to be him.  Good thought but why would he leave a battered sticker on there that had no connection to him?  Anyway its a line of enquiry for them.  ---------- Post added 06-08-2014 at 11:07 ----------  http://www.dewsburyroadrunners.co.uk/cgi/profile.php?index=61900&PHPSESSID=ce9b0b9e747e6f34b43fc56aef732eec  Says he is 67, but may not have been updated recently? Then again, all those results have him in the M55 category and the top of the page says he is now in the M65 one.  ---------- Post added 06-08-2014 at 11:12 ----------  Malcolm Cottam is also mentioned on the 19th page of this  http://www.stjameschurch.org/insight/2011_04-05.pdf  Even a phone number for him on there. Edited August 6, 2014 by No User Name Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Hinzy9   10 #94 Posted August 6, 2014 Sure the current owner of the helmet may not be the same person that took part in the triathlon in 2002 but it's a bloody good starting point isn't it. Especially as he was wearing a ‘Barnsley Metrodome Triathlon 1990' t shirt as well.  To be honest I'm shocked by sheer incompetence of the police in this matter. This isn't just a failure of basic policing practices its a failure of basic common sense.  Say you'd found a cycle helmet at the side of the road with a Friar Tuck Triathlon 2002- Race number 100 sticker on it. You were keen to see it returned to its owner, surely the first thing anyone would do is go online and try and find the triathlon results or failing that contact the club who organised the event.  You don't need to be Bergerac to work this one out do you! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
No User Name   10 #95 Posted August 6, 2014 (edited) http://www.openupsheffield.co.uk/artists/Cottam_Malcolm.php  Same phone number as on that St James newsletter I posted above.  http://www.sheffieldtelegraph.co.uk/news/local/malcolm-wins-award-as-green-hero-1-1654280  Anyone live near Norton Park Crescent? Edited August 6, 2014 by No User Name Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Sazz1006 Â Â 10 #96 Posted August 6, 2014 I was in the tailbacks last Thursday and couldn't get the sight out of my mind, even though apart from the bike and a car on a closed road there was nothing really to indicate what had happened. When I heard the details I couldn't stop thinking about it but was thinking of the reasons he hasn't been identified: someone who lived on his own, someone whose work colleagues wouldn't miss him not being there, a teacher perhaps? Someone whose neighbours would think he was on holiday? Awful situation. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...