Jump to content

Ukip. All discussion here please.

Recommended Posts

How is that being tow faced? He made a mistake, went too far and then said sorry.

 

Tell you what is two faced, saying that you're going to protect the NHS, then allowing it to become slowly privatised, leading to massive job and budget cuts.

 

Or.......being elected as Mayor of London, then spending more time in meetings with bankers that with your constituents.

 

Neither Cameron or Boris have apologised to us for that yet!

 

Tow faced ???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tow faced ???

 

The definition of two faced is, deceitful or hypocritical. Do you know what deceitful and hypocritical mean??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tow faced ???

 

What he did with Johnathan Ross then let's his mouth say owt

 

Let's?

 

---------- Post added 11-12-2014 at 07:52 ----------

 

TREAT EVERYDAY AS YOUR LAST ONE DAY YOU WILL BE RIGHT!

 

Everyday?

 

Neil Hamilton is having trouble with his UKIP expenses. Who would have thought that such a transparently honest man would have his financial probity questioned?

 

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/dec/10/neil-hamilton-withdraws-basildon-south-ukip-expenses-claim-controversy

Edited by LeMaquis

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Let's?

 

---------- Post added 11-12-2014 at 07:52 ----------

 

 

Everyday?

 

Neil Hamilton is having trouble with his UKIP expenses. Who would have thought that such a transparently honest man would have his financial probity questioned?

 

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/dec/10/neil-hamilton-withdraws-basildon-south-ukip-expenses-claim-controversy

 

:loopy:IDIOT:loopy:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
:loopy:IDIOT:loopy:

 

I agree, what type of political party welcomes Neil Hamilton into their arms, only to be surprised when he does something dishonest.

 

Idiots!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I agree, what type of political party welcomes Neil Hamilton into their arms, only to be surprised when he does something dishonest.

 

Idiots!

 

Think he and his wife got mixed up in a porn scandal as well?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Think he and his wife got mixed up in a porn scandal as well?

 

These sleazy political parties, who can you trust?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Hamilton was never proved to have done what was claimed. If I remember his guilt was that he backed out of suing Al-Fayed and therefore must have been guilty...

 

He's a minor figure in the party but if he's done wrong he'll be out. UKIP deal with these things in a much more honest open way.

 

But with all the made up stuff about UKIP I won't believe anything until it is proved.

 

I note the TV media isn't reporting the Bird allegations now its clear the woman was lying.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think Hamilton was never proved to have done what was claimed. If I remember his guilt was that he backed out of suing Al-Fayed and therefore must have been guilty...

 

He's a minor figure in the party but if he's done wrong he'll be out. UKIP deal with these things in a much more honest open way.

 

But with all the made up stuff about UKIP I won't believe anything until it is proved.

 

I note the TV media isn't reporting the Bird allegations now its clear the woman was lying.

 

The enquiry that was set up to investigate Hamilton found him guilty. Hamilton lost his libel against Al-Fayed and he also lost his appeal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The enquiry that was set up to investigate Hamilton found him guilty. Hamilton lost his libel against Al-Fayed and he also lost his appeal.

 

I was referring to any court case finding him guilty. But having looked at some stuff you are right about Al-Fayed... I read somewhere a while ago that he dropped the liable action... that must have been something else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I was referring to any court case finding him guilty. But having looked at some stuff you are right about Al-Fayed... I read somewhere a while ago that he dropped the liable action... that must have been something else.

 

He dropped his libel case against the Guardian, who broke the news, on the day that the trial was due to start.

 

As I said he was found guilty by a parliamentary enquiry, who concluded that 'he did indeed take cash in brown envelopes'

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
He dropped his libel case against the Guardian, who broke the news, on the day that the trial was due to start.

 

As I said he was found guilty by a parliamentary enquiry, who concluded that 'he did indeed take cash in brown envelopes'

 

He'll be gone if he's done something wrong.

 

I think there's been that much stuff about UKIP that has been claimed that's not true that people now don't believe stuff, even the true ones.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.