The Labour Party. All discussion here please

[Jonny5 10]

That's a brilliant article. I got Bingo on my Socialist stereotype card before the end of the 1st paragraph.

 

They even used quotes from Len McCluskey, the man with his snout further in the trough than just about anyone else in the country at the end there. Marvellous stuff.

[Robin-H 11]

erm...Hackney Lad, i am not trying to prove anything....

and your silly ridicule remarks about "your love for Jeremy" and that kind of nonsense makes you look foolish, but that is all we expect from the haters like you...just keep on hating Hackney Lad, and we will keep on laughing at you.....

I put the link up because i thought it gave another perspective to all the negative comments, not that i was trying to win any points against all the haters

 

Oh come on. You’ve done nothing but show empthatic and blinded adoration for Corbyn on this forum, to the extent that it has become a bit of a running joke. Not trying the prove anything!? Pull the other one.

[hackey lad 3,928]

erm...Hackney Lad, i am not trying to prove anything....

and your silly ridicule remarks about "your love for Jeremy" and that kind of nonsense makes you look foolish, but that is all we expect from the haters like you...just keep on hating Hackney Lad, and we will keep on laughing at you.....

I put the link up because i thought it gave another perspective to all the negative comments, not that i was trying to win any points against all the haters

 

I don't know where you are coming from with the haters comment maybe you should look at yourself . I don't hate you and I don't hate Jeremy . "another perspective to all the negative comments " and that perspective comes from people who love/like Jeremy . What would you expect from that site ?

[GhostRiders 15]

erm...Hackney Lad, i am not trying to prove anything...

 

Yes you are, you posted a link to something that you considered, 'facts' (your words) to disprove the opinion of those you call 'haters' (your words). Therefore you are trying to prove something. The language you are using is betraying the words you are saying.

 

Linguistically this is called 'implicature' and it is a philosophical term to describe exactly what you are doing.

 

and your silly ridicule remarks about "your love for Jeremy" and that kind of nonsense makes you look foolish, but that is all we expect from the haters like you...just keep on hating Hackney Lad, and we will keep on laughing at you.....

 

They don't make him look at all foolish. Again, your language betrays you. It is blatantly obvious to anyone who isn't in the trees that you're in the Corbyn wood.

 

I put the link up because i thought it gave another perspective to all the negative comments, not that i was trying to win any points against all the haters

 

You quite obviously put the exceptionally biased, out of context link up as a form of 'evidence' to try and back up your own perspective. And you are fooling no one by saying otherwise.

 

If you want an impartial view you would have linked to something like a cross section of the American media's opinion of Jeremy Corbyn (not necessarily America, France, Spain etc) basically any non UK country who is looking in from the outside. That would be considered impartial.

[Anna B 1,401]

Yes you are, you posted a link to something that you considered, 'facts' (your words) to disprove the opinion of those you call 'haters' (your words). Therefore you are trying to prove something. The language you are using is betraying the words you are saying.

 

Linguistically this is called 'implicature' and it is a philosophical term to describe exactly what you are doing.

 

 

 

They don't make him look at all foolish. Again, your language betrays you. It is blatantly obvious to anyone who isn't in the trees that you're in the Corbyn wood.

 

 

 

You quite obviously put the exceptionally biased, out of context link up as a form of 'evidence' to try and back up your own perspective. And you are fooling no one by saying otherwise.

 

If you want an impartial view you would have linked to something like a cross section of the American media's opinion of Jeremy Corbyn (not necessarily America, France, Spain etc) basically any non UK country who is looking in from the outside. That would be considered impartial.

 

 

Where do you suppose these countries get their information from?

 

I find these deliberate personal barbs in people's comments (Corbyn lover etc) unpleasant, unworthy and unnecessary

[Mister M 1,594]

[/b]

 

Where do you suppose these countries get their information from?

 

I find these deliberate personal barbs in people's comments (Corbyn lover etc) unpleasant, unworthy and unnecessary

 

It's a shame that those dishing out these nasty comments, can't summon up the wit or wherewithall to support Theresa May and the government with the same vigour and determination.

I wouldn't take it personally Anna; I think the comments say more about them and their mindset, than they do about Corbyn, the Labour Party or you.

[Jonny5 10]

[/b]

 

Where do you suppose these countries get their information from?

 

I find these deliberate personal barbs in people's comments (Corbyn lover etc) unpleasant, unworthy and unnecessary

 

But you have no problem when people accuses others of being Sun readers/Tories/Uneducated etc.

 

It works both ways. But then Corbyomics is all about our way or the highway so no wonder you think it's ok to hand it out but not take anything back.

 

---------- Post added 12-05-2018 at 15:05 ----------

 

It's a shame that those dishing out these nasty comments, can't summon up the wit or wherewithall to support Theresa May and the government with the same vigour and determination.

I wouldn't take it personally Anna; I think the comments say more about them and their mindset, than they do about Corbyn, the Labour Party or you.

You are better/smarter than this.

[nikki-red 307]

Theres already been more than one warning on this thread about posting in a civil manner.

 

If you cant have a discussion without resorting to personal comments then unless you want your accounts suspending I suggest you dont post.

 

Thank you.

[Calahonda 11]

I don’t understand the almost god like adulation that Jezza receives from his followers, what has he done other than to lose two general elections? Even May, who must be the worst Tory leader/prime minister since Eden, has won one, and that was against him.

[GhostRiders 15]

[/b]

 

Where do you suppose these countries get their information from?

 

What would you recommend as an impartial source if not a complete third party?

 

I find these deliberate personal barbs in people's comments (Corbyn lover etc) unpleasant, unworthy and unnecessary

 

I don't think calling someone who is blatantly a massive Corbyn supporter a Corbyn lover is a barbed comment. Are you really sinking to going down that route when you yourself have suggested that if people don't support Corbyn they must be so stupid that they are brainwashed by the media.

 

Stop and think for a second which is the worst of the two above examples.

[altus 533]

I don’t understand the almost god like adulation that Jezza receives from his followers, what has he done other than to lose two general elections? Even May, who must be the worst Tory leader/prime minister since Eden, has won one, and that was against him.

I know about the 2017 one, which was the other?

[Calahonda 11]

I know about the 2017 one, which was the other?

 

Quite right, I had actually forgotten about Mr Ed, so what has he done, other than to lose one general election against a very weak Tory leader?