Jump to content

The Labour Party. All discussion here please

Vaati

This is the final warning we are going to give about bickering, name calling etc. If a post breaks the forum rules, report it. Any further and accounts will be suspended.

Message added by Vaati

Recommended Posts

Why 'likewise'? The Co-operative Party might have 75% of current Labour MPs, by current reckoning.

 

So the Co-operative Party booms because it refuses to be co-operative with Corbyn and McDonnell?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Why 'likewise'? The Co-operative Party might have 75% of current Labour MPs, by current reckoning.

 

Sure. Maybe as many as 80% if they all jump. But come the election, the radical former Labour voters will vote for Corbyn's lot and the moderate former Labour voters will vote for the other lot and with FPTP that will cost both parties a lot of seats.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sure. Maybe as many as 80% if they all jump. But come the election, the radical former Labour voters will vote for Corbyn's lot and the moderate former Labour voters will vote for the other lot and with FPTP that will cost both parties a lot of seats.

 

Nothing but good news.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nothing but good news.

 

It's fine for us. But socialists (as much as I worry about them forming a government), surely deserve serious representation in parliament.

A lot of people believe in the government taking a bigger hand in the economy, and they deserve to be heard. This should not be sabotaged by a bunch of [words I'm not allowed to use on the forum] like Momentum.

I think the government should be smaller and less regulatory. I would not like it if a hypothetical collection of [more words I'm not allowed to use on the forum] anti-Momentum (on the other thread we agreed to called them "Inertia") created such a political mess that these views were not meaningfully represented in parliament.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
But what will he taking over? A party split in two? A tiny party?

 

 

Or a party with 600,000 members. Corbyn's victory would have been even larger if 130,000 new members had been allowed to vote,eg 200 Bristol members suspended and their votes cancelled.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Or a party with 600,000 members. Corbyn's victory would have been even larger if 130,000 new members had been allowed to vote,eg 200 Bristol members suspended and their votes cancelled.

 

Would you rather be in a party with 600,000 members and 50 MPs or 100,000 members and 400 MPs?

Manchester United have a lot of supporters. Nobody expects them to form a government any time soon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Would you rather be in a party with 600,000 members and 50 MPs or 100,000 members and 400 MPs?

Manchester United have a lot of supporters. Nobody expects them to form a government any time soon.

 

50 MPs ? Labour have about 200 ? Strange boy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For reasons unknown McDonnell and Watson are saying they expect the Tories to call an early general election. What planet are they on?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
50 MPs ? Labour have about 200 ? Strange boy

 

Errrr he's saying the party will split and Corbyn will have fewer MPs because the majority will form another party.

 

Not strange at all if you apply a bit of thought to the post...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
For reasons unknown McDonnell and Watson are saying they expect the Tories to call an early general election. What planet are they on?

They are just trying to scare the various factions within the party towards unity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.