megalithic   10 #13 Posted February 2, 2014 Yes, we do still use early 19th century legislation from Dickens' times in relation to poverty and homelessness.  How can someone be in true poverty but own a mobile phone ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
tinfoilhat   11 #14 Posted February 2, 2014 How can someone be in true poverty but own a mobile phone ?  It's a really old Nokia that only sends texts and you can play snake on it. Brings a tear to your eye. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
megalithic   10 #15 Posted February 2, 2014 It's a really old Nokia that only sends texts and you can play snake on it. Brings a tear to your eye.  If they were making calls they'd bought credit. Would you buy credit if genuinely skint ? I'd buy food. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
tinfoilhat   11 #16 Posted February 2, 2014 If they were making calls they'd bought credit. Would you buy credit if genuinely skint ? I'd buy food.  No, I'd beg aggressively get some credit, bag me self a suspended coffee, more begging then a bottle of cider. Then I get some food. Some of course then go home. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Squiggs   11 #17 Posted February 2, 2014 How can someone be in true poverty but own a mobile phone ? It is quite possible to have none of the essentials for life (a roof over your head; food) but have a cheap old payg mobile phone that may provide a lifeline - or a necessary contact for services.  Quite possibly not the case in the OP, but in a general response to relying on 1824 laws, this makes it even the more ridiculous Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
gavnmel   10 #18 Posted February 2, 2014 ive no sympathy for em. They chose to come here,if they dont like it-GO BACK TO WHERE YOU CAME FROM. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Winner99   10 #19 Posted February 2, 2014 Yes, we do still use early 19th century legislation from Dickens' times in relation to poverty and homelessness. Not suggesting that there should be a free-for-all on begging but it shows how little we have moved on in some ways, in 190 years  What would really make this city better is more beggers and viscous dogs Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Squiggs   11 #20 Posted February 2, 2014 What would really make this city better is more beggers and viscous dogs  I agree. Dogs are far too runny these days, they are almost puddles. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
mg16 Â Â 10 #21 Posted February 2, 2014 just say "no". Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
woodmally   10 #22 Posted February 2, 2014 just say "no".  I did today in Subway 5 times before she got the message. Even used hand gestures to indicate no. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Disco Stu   10 #23 Posted February 2, 2014 you can't walk up fargate without being accousted by ,big issue sellers,church folk,beggers,people wanting you to sign this n that, people shoving leaflets in your hand ,students shaking buckets at you,and before you ask I am a miserable sod !!!!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Winner99 Â Â 10 #24 Posted February 2, 2014 I agree. Dogs are far too runny these days, they are almost puddles. Â I was thinking more of biting a child's leg off Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...