JFKvsNixon   11 #217 Posted November 10, 2013 Its you that is being argumentative, he wasn't tried by his peers, I've asked you to provide a link to the definition of peer which would work in this case, but you can't.  Ok, what you do you understand by the legal phrase trial by peers? Do you believe that to receive a fair trial can I only be tried by bad tempered, southern married fathers, in their late 30s, with a university degree working in a research based profession? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
angos   10 #218 Posted November 10, 2013 Ok, what you do you understand by the legal phrase trial by peers? Do you believe that to receive a fair trial can I only be tried by southern married fathers, in their late 30s, with a university degree working in a research based profession?  What I understand is that he wasn't tried by his peers, he was tried by his superiors. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
JFKvsNixon   11 #219 Posted November 10, 2013 What I understand is that he wasn't tried by his peers, he was tried by his superiors.  So do you believe that anybody in this country are actually tried by their peers? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
tinfoilhat   11 #220 Posted November 10, 2013 More to the point would the people that are happy to see the marine in jail, be condemning the actions of the insurgent, or would they as usual be making excuses for him. ---------- Post added 10-11-2013 at 21:06 ----------   I didn't need Google to know that he wasn't tried by his peers, you seam intent on laboring a point you have lost.  I find so hard to picture a world where an afghan insurgent is tried for murder. Lets say he is arrested (possibly by elvis riding in on shergar) and is found guilty in court (judged by lord Lucan) yeah I'd be thrilled to see him jailed!!!!  I think we are some way from that happening in Afghanistan (or Iraq when those red caps were killed - we're no closer to seeing justice there either as far as I know).  ---------- Post added 10-11-2013 at 21:12 ----------  What I understand is that he wasn't tried by his peers, he was tried by his superiors.  Something he knew would happen when he signed up or at least after 20 years of service. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
boyfriday   21 #221 Posted November 10, 2013 I don't agree with what the soldier did.............but!!! if the boot was on the other foot and it was an Afghan soldier that held the gun and killed a british soldier would they be facing a prison sentence.  You've not considered that's what separates us from savages? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
AdamSmith   10 #222 Posted November 10, 2013 You've not considered that's what separates us from savages?  you cant say that BF:o:o:o:o Halibut will be along in a minute to chastise you:gag: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Glamrocker   10 #223 Posted November 10, 2013 Almost certainly not, but so what? So What ? thats about par for the course Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
boyfriday   21 #224 Posted November 10, 2013 you cant say that BF:o:o:o:o Halibut will be along in a minute to chastise you:gag:  I wasn't referring to anyone specifically Adam, honest  ---------- Post added 10-11-2013 at 21:18 ----------  So What ? thats about par for the course  I think the point is we don't have to reduce ourselves to the lowest common denominator. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
angos   10 #225 Posted November 10, 2013  Something he knew would happen when he signed up or at least after 20 years of service.  I haven't disputed that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Joanl   12 #226 Posted November 10, 2013 I'm surprised they don't issue an order that every soldier has to say to the enemy, "excuse me sir, do you mind if I just shoot you" and await his reply before shooting him....... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
ronthenekred   10 #227 Posted November 11, 2013   Well of course you did..you looked and thought.."Bingo" it's how you post, it's you modus operandi.  Out of interest, do you have an issue with him being judged by his "superiors"? Superiors with with long standing experience.   I didn't need Google to know that he wasn't tried by his peers, you seam intent on laboring a point you have lost.  You mean like...  "he was found guilty to appease people like you"  ..to which you still haven't explained. I understand why you didn't explain and "lost"  And I did concede on the literal meaning, unless you interpreted " I'll give it to you" as something else. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
tinfoilhat   11 #228 Posted November 11, 2013 I'm surprised they don't issue an order that every soldier has to say to the enemy, "excuse me sir, do you mind if I just shoot you" and await his reply before shooting him.......  The rules of engagement are too strict out there already. Google them and be shocked! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...