MrSmith   10 #205 Posted June 20, 2013 So now you're presenting your little scenario as reality, without any supporting evidence. Wow.  I've provided lots of supporting evidence to support it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
JFKvsNixon   11 #206 Posted June 20, 2013 I've provided lots of supporting evidence to support it.  That is not supporting evidence for this case. Just because something is documented on the internet to have happened, it does mean this it has anything relevant to say in the pedophile Hall's case.  I'm amazed that you take something that most wouldn't even consider evidence, when I say most I actually mean everybody else, and then you place a similar if not even greater weight than multiple corroborating witnesses and a confession.  To be clear, on one side as I said there are multiple corroborating witnesses, and a confession. On the other side there are links to unrelated cases in a completely different law system. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
MrSmith   10 #207 Posted June 20, 2013 That is not supporting evidence for this case. Just because something is documented on the internet to have happened, it does mean this it has anything relevant to say in the pedophile Hall's case.  I'm amazed that you take something that most wouldn't even consider evidence, when I say most I actually mean everybody else, and then you place a similar if not even greater weight than multiple corroborating witnesses and a confession.  To be clear, on one side as I said there are multiple corroborating witnesses, and a confession. On the other side there are links to unrelated cases in a completely different law system.  It’s nice that you apparently know the opinion of everyone; you must feel all godlike, but be warned people have been locked up in mental institutions for much less. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
JFKvsNixon   11 #208 Posted June 20, 2013 It’s nice that you apparently know the opinion of everyone; you must feel all godlike, but be warned people have been locked up in mental institutions for much less.  What you call godlike, I call common sense. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
MrSmith   10 #209 Posted June 20, 2013 What you call godlike, I call common sense.  So its common sense that you know the opinion of everyone else. OK. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
JFKvsNixon   11 #210 Posted June 20, 2013 So its common sense that you know the opinion of everyone else. OK.  LOL.  No, it's common sense that multiple corroborating witnesses and a confession carry a far greater weight of evidence for this case than some randomly googled cases in a completely different legal system. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
MrSmith   10 #211 Posted June 20, 2013 LOL. No, it's common sense that multiple corroborating witnesses and a confession carry a far greater weight of evidence for this case than some randomly googled cases in a completely different legal system.  I imagine it's also common sense every time an innocent person is charged and convicted based of corroborating evidence from multiple witnesses, even though several years later it is proved that they were infact inocent allalong.  Makes you wonder how they got it wrong so many times when its just commen sense. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
boyfriday   21 #212 Posted June 20, 2013 I imagine it's also common sense every time an innocent person is charged and convicted based of corroborating evidence from multiple witnesses, even though several years later it is proved that they were infact inocent allalong.  Makes you wonder how they got it wrong so many times when its just commen sense.  Makes you wonder why an innocent person would plead guilty to avoid that possibility. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
SqueakyPete   10 #213 Posted June 20, 2013 I imagine it's also common sense every time an innocent person is charged and convicted based of corroborating evidence from multiple witnesses, even though several years later it is proved that they were infact inocent allalong.  Makes you wonder how they got it wrong so many times when its just commen sense.  When was the last time someone was wrongly locked up for being a paedophile in the U.k? Links would be great,but just be careful what you put into Google,we wouldn't want the Police wrongly knocking on your door,would we? You do have a great ability to dig a hole,and not know when to stop. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
MrSmith   10 #214 Posted June 20, 2013 When was the last time someone was wrongly locked up for being a paedophile in the U.k? Links would be great,but just be careful what you put into Google,we wouldn't want the Police wrongly knocking on your door,would we? You do have a great ability to dig a hole,and not know when to stop.  I'm not the one in the hole, I proved my point a while back. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
andygardener   10 #215 Posted June 20, 2013 I'm not the one in the hole, I proved my point a while back.  No, you haven't.  If you have any examples of alledged pedophiles accused by multiple independant witnesses in our country who pled guilty to the offences and were subsequently found to be entirely innocent then you will have proved your point.  Unless you can do that then you're defending this nonce and slandering his victims by suggesting they may be lying despite his admission to the crimes he committed against them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
MrSmith   10 #216 Posted June 20, 2013 No, you haven't. If you have any examples of alledged pedophiles accused by multiple independant witnesses in our country who pled guilty to the offences and were subsequently found to be entirely innocent then you will have proved your point.  Unless you can do that then you're defending this nonce and slandering his victims by suggesting they may be lying despite his admission to the crimes he committed against them.  I haven't suggested they are lying, that just in your head, you are letting your emotions run riot with common sense. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...