cressida Posted November 25, 2012 Share Posted November 25, 2012 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-20482930 About time too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FACEBOOK Posted November 25, 2012 Share Posted November 25, 2012 //////////////////////// Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cgksheff Posted November 25, 2012 Share Posted November 25, 2012 I wonder how the legislation is worded. The Scots version is a bit worrying in as much as it can criminalise 'A' if 'B' feels threatened regardless of whether or not 'A' intended to threaten. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strix Posted November 25, 2012 Share Posted November 25, 2012 The calls for reform came after a series of cases involving stalkers who went on to kill, including Clifford Mills, 49, who stalked his ex-girlfriend Lorna Smith on Facebook before stabbing her to death at his flat in Brixton, south London, in February last year. He was jailed in February for life, with a minimum term of 21 years, after being found guilty of murder. how does anybody know about Facebook stalking though? Unless it comes with actual threats/messages People really should be more careful with what they put on there. A friend recently told me of an incident where she'd met up with friends, one of whom had done that 'out at X, with A,B&C' thing. How do you stop friends from flagging your house is empty in that fashion, or from grassing you up to people you don't want knowing your business? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey Shaw Posted November 26, 2012 Share Posted November 26, 2012 I wonder how the legislation is worded. See s.111/112 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2012/9/section/111#text%3D%22stalking%22 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cgksheff Posted November 26, 2012 Share Posted November 26, 2012 See s.111/112 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2012/9/section/111#text%3D%22stalking%22 Thank you. ©the person whose course of conduct it is knows or ought to know that the course of conduct amounts to harassment of the other person. ... appears to cover my query. ©publishing any statement or other material— (i)relating or purporting to relate to a person, or (ii)purporting to originate from a person, (d)monitoring the use by a person of the internet, email or any other form of electronic communication, .... would appear to cover Strix's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andygardener Posted November 26, 2012 Share Posted November 26, 2012 See s.111/112 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2012/9/section/111#text%3D%22stalking%22 Cheers for the link Jeffrey. Looking at the way it's worded it seems like they've not even tried to come up with a precise law. Criminalise everything if it's done in a "stalky" way and let the judges sort it out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mecky Posted November 27, 2012 Share Posted November 27, 2012 Does this include stalking by government officials, private investigators and the like? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
llamatron Posted November 27, 2012 Share Posted November 27, 2012 Im really not convinced we needed any new laws. We could have just enforced the ones we had better. If someone threatened to kill another person the police could have just taken it seriously rather than told the victim to keep a note of everything. I guess its a step forward though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monkey104 Posted November 27, 2012 Share Posted November 27, 2012 I wonder how the legislation is worded. The Scots version is a bit worrying in as much as it can criminalise 'A' if 'B' feels threatened regardless of whether or not 'A' intended to threaten. Unfortunately a lot of the law works on intention and recklessness which just defines the severity. Intention having the ' men's rea' or putting things in action to intentionally cause the act and recklessness is the carrying out of the act not with the intention to harm or damage but knowing that there is a possibility that harm or damage may be done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.