Stomp   10 #145 Posted January 16, 2013 I think her case sets an unfavourable privilege for religious identity over non religious identity.  I agree. I am a Christian as already mentioned, and wear a Crucifix, but if my employer set a "necklaces must be covered" policy then I would comply with it. The right of an employer to set it's own rules regarding clothing must come first. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
tinfoilhat   11 #146 Posted January 16, 2013 I agree. I am a Christian as already mentioned, and wear a Crucifix, but if my employer set a "necklaces must be covered" policy then I would comply with it. The right of an employer to set it's own rules regarding clothing must come first.  Which doesn't seem unreasonable to me. Working Christmas day, if you work in a certain industry doesn't seem unreasonable either - Onewheeldave feels differently. I hope for his sake a care home worker looking after one of his elderly realitives isn't the one who try's the test case. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
