Magilla   510 #37 Posted October 23, 2012 An american court has said that Apple are the good guys and Samsung are the tea leafs. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/aug/25/apple-crushes-samsung-quest-global-tech-domination?newsfeed=true  But for how long?  http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-20040549 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
kidneystone   23 #38 Posted November 1, 2012 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-20165664 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
altus   534 #39 Posted November 1, 2012 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-20165664  Apple seem to be trying to trash their reputation as quickly as possible. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
kidneystone   23 #40 Posted November 9, 2012 Let’s hope common sense prevails and the verdict is overturned. Should never have been guilty in the first place.   http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/tech/news/a437053/apple-patent-victory-over-samsung-under-scrutiny.html Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
altus   534 #41 Posted November 9, 2012 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-20165664 The official release of the revised ruling is available here.  It concludes:- I hope that the lack of integrity involved in this incident is entirely atypical of Apple. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Magilla   510 #42 Posted November 9, 2012 The $1bn payout is also up for challenge:-  http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/11/09/samsung_apple_jury_foreman_biased/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
swarfendor437 Â Â 14 #43 Posted November 10, 2012 http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/10/12/apple_licenses_swiss_clock/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
altus   534 #44 Posted November 12, 2012 Samsung increases Apple's processor prices by 20%.  Meanwhile, Apple's attempts to buy screens from someone other than Samsung may have forced them to spend $2 billion just to keep Sharp afloat so they can produce iPhone 5 screens. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
kidneystone   23 #45 Posted June 5, 2014 Who would have thought it, Apple taking someone else's name. They'll be claiming next that they thought of it first.  http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-27713242 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
1295galaxy   20 #46 Posted June 5, 2014 O.k we were All Happy Apple joining the Mobile Market,an changed the phones to Smartphones,but they think they Are Superior an can not take a Challenge,an Apple is getting away from Over Pricing the Value of the Phones,Samsung are putting more pressure on Apple,an the Court Cases just shows how Apple can not Stand a Challenge,Why couldn"t they join the Tennis Market as theres loads of Courts available for them Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
altus   534 #47 Posted June 5, 2014 Who would have thought it, Apple taking someone else's name. They'll be claiming next that they thought of it first. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-27713242  Apple have form when it comes to using other people's trademarks:  Apple Corps Fujitsu iPAD Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...