chem1st Posted July 6, 2012 Share Posted July 6, 2012 The woman does actually collect benefits £25k a year of them. £500 a week! She is entitled to claim 484 pounds per week in child benefits and child tax credits, and she does claim these benefits. That is just over 25000 a year. Child benefit is a benefit. Child tax credits are also a benefit. Her husband would also be entitled to working tax credit. Working tax credit is also a benefit, but without knowing more about his work I couldn't tell you how much working tax credit he would be able to claim. Mrs Sullivan and her husband Mike, 39, have had to buy a 17-seater minibus to cope with the demands of their horde of children - an expensive transport option considering such vehicles average at 20-25 miles per gallon compared to between 50 and 60 miles per gallon for a family hatchback. The family also regularly get through 20 loaves and 50 pints of milk a week. But the couple, from Hoo, Kent, live off Mr Sullivan’s salary from his own business - Sullivan Joinery and Crafts - and do not claim state handouts apart from tax credits and child benefit. Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2169700/Britains-busiest-mum-expecting-TWELFTH-baby--refuses-collect-benefits.html#ixzz1zr2RbmxN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mj.scuba Posted July 6, 2012 Share Posted July 6, 2012 One of them is definately the milkman's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chem1st Posted July 6, 2012 Author Share Posted July 6, 2012 One of them is definately the milkman's. The half cast one is from a previous relationship, along with her brother (who might have been the milkman's) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mj.scuba Posted July 6, 2012 Share Posted July 6, 2012 The half cast one is from a previous relationship, along with her brother (who might have been the milkman's) You can't go saying that in 2012. Mixed race. Get with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Olive Posted July 6, 2012 Share Posted July 6, 2012 Oo, that's what I thought. I think teenage daughter has been overdoing the panstick! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frededwards Posted July 6, 2012 Share Posted July 6, 2012 You can't go saying that in 2012. Mixed race. Get with it. Errr. I think the P C Wombles are actually insisting upon "Dual Heritage" this week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rupert_Baehr Posted July 6, 2012 Share Posted July 6, 2012 Or should that be 'Dual Voltage'? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSmith Posted July 6, 2012 Share Posted July 6, 2012 The woman does actually collect benefits £25k a year of them. £500 a week! She is entitled to claim 484 pounds per week in child benefits and child tax credits, and she does claim these benefits. That is just over 25000 a year. Child benefit is a benefit. Child tax credits are also a benefit. Her husband would also be entitled to working tax credit. Working tax credit is also a benefit, but without knowing more about his work I couldn't tell you how much working tax credit he would be able to claim. Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2169700/Britains-busiest-mum-expecting-TWELFTH-baby--refuses-collect-benefits.html#ixzz1zr2RbmxN Let’s hope the kids don’t all have 12 kids. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyfriday Posted July 6, 2012 Share Posted July 6, 2012 Let’s hope the kids don’t all have 12 kids. If they're as enterprising and self sufficient as their parents that's EXACTLY what this country needs! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyfriday Posted July 6, 2012 Share Posted July 6, 2012 The half cast one is from a previous relationship, along with her brother (who might have been the milkman's) Looking at the picture the oldest boy looks nowt like his sibling Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.