Obelix   11 #133 Posted July 6, 2012 So you would want me to attribute it incorrectly? :-) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
L00b   441 #134 Posted July 6, 2012 (edited) Thank God we did not have to rely upon MrSmith's apathy to vanquish UK's experimental Phorm and its global follow-up ACTA  The irony is, for a long time I had substantially the same viewpoint of "I'm with the good guys, what harm can there be to me?" Thank God for the increasing regularity of Gvt/Big Corpo scandals these past few years, the ensuing dirty laundry washing-in-public session, which eventually shows beyond a shadow of a doubt how and why such legislation comes about.  For the record, I am a legal practitionner btw. Edited July 6, 2012 by L00b Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Cyclone   10 #135 Posted July 6, 2012 So you would want me to attribute it incorrectly? :-)  Were you not attempting to quote Benjamin Franklin?  http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Benjamin_Franklin  ah I see, I mistakenly thought he was a US president, but he never was! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
MrSmith   10 #136 Posted July 6, 2012 Will it cost money? - Yes, either service providers or the government will pay which means either higher prices for the service or higher taxes. Or will it save money? - Nope, this is all new equipment being installed which has to be paid for and maintained at some cost, plus all the bureaucracy which will be created to handle the government side of things Will it catch criminals and make everyone safer? - No, criminals and terrorists will simply switch to different forms of communication- dead letter drops, word of mouth, steganography, whereas innocent people will be monitored unnecessarily  Well based on these answers its a stupid idea, makes one wonder why they are wanting to do it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Anna B Â Â 1,401 #137 Posted July 6, 2012 Why would a government go to the expense of paying people to do that? All the main parties have enough supporters to do that for free and many of them would do so without any official encouragement - you only have to look at this forum to see that. Â You'd think so wouldn't you? Â But these are different. Â They don't engage with the argument, (I've no problem with people who have an opposite point of view, I enjoy a passionate discussion.) These people would rather waste time arguing over the silliest things that don't matter, and sidetrack the discussion, constantly stopping it from getting back on course, or they become personal and abusive until the thread is closed down. Â It's got so bad that I know several people who will no longer use Sheffield Forum because of it, so I know it's not just me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
esme   10 #138 Posted July 16, 2012 (edited) Looks like town halls are fighting to keep their access, under RIPA as well despite the Government "considering" restricting their access.  Telegraph 12th July 2012  Hundreds of other public bodies that currently have monitoring powers at varied levels will lose them unless they can argue their case during the Bill process.  Paul Bettison, LGA regulatory champion, told the joint committee he was not seeking extra powers but wanted to retain those they already have  Councils respond to 'snooping claims' LGA media release 13 July 2012 Local authorities would never seek to intrude into people's personal affairs and have no desire to use these powers to investigate minor offences. Sometimes it is essential for councils to be able to access communications data to protect the public.Never ? really ? Mail : 1,000 innocent victims of Big Brother Britain: Families were spied on wrongly because of blunders by officials He also revealed details of a council going beyond its legal powers to use snooping laws to spy on a family suspected of cheating school catchment area rules.Seems to have missed that one. In my opinion we can't trust the authorities with unrestricted access to this data, they provide us with examples of why we should not trust them regularly, if they can demonstrate a need to collect this information then they can obtain a warrant before they start. Edited July 16, 2012 by esme Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
alchresearch   214 #139 Posted July 17, 2012 Is anyone outraged at this, or not bothered because its not the government?   Facebook software screens chats for criminal behaviour Facebook is using a piece of software which screens it users’ conversations for criminal activity and suspicious behaviour, according to a report.  http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/facebook/9398590/Facebook-software-screens-chats-for-criminal-behaviour.html Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Cyclone   10 #140 Posted July 17, 2012 I'm bothered by it, I'll avoid using facebook messages and try to use email instead. I can do that because it's not the government and isn't ubiquitous. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
namtaB   10 #141 Posted July 17, 2012 Will my bomb making exploits be found out ??? I use facebook to gather all my ingredients to cause terror and upset... Bloody liberty if you ask me  Gotta go the nitro is bubbling Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
esme   10 #142 Posted July 17, 2012 (edited) Is anyone outraged at this, or not bothered because its not the government?  Facebook software screens chats for criminal behaviour Facebook is using a piece of software which screens it users’ conversations for criminal activity and suspicious behaviour, according to a report.  http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/facebook/9398590/Facebook-software-screens-chats-for-criminal-behaviour.html It would seem they are no longer content with making a profit from behavioral analysis and now they want to try social engineering instead. However there is a crucial difference between this and what the government intends.  With this you can choose not to use their service and go use something else, the government isn't giving you any choice in the matter, whether it's communication via internet, phone or post they intend to monitor it. Will my bomb making exploits be found out ??? I use facebook to gather all my ingredients to cause terror and upset... Bloody liberty if you ask me  Gotta go the nitro is bubbling I'd be very careful about making jokes like that, remember what happened to the guy who made a similar joke about Doncaster airport Edited July 17, 2012 by esme Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...