andyofborg   11 #697 Posted June 7, 2014 The obsession with fleecing motorists continues .  you're only get a fine if you break the speed limit which is displayed for all to see so really it's an obsession with fleecing those to stupid to understand road signs or too arrogant to think that they apply to them.  Either way, lets have more of them and make the roads nicer and safer to drive on Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
ANGELFIRE1 Â Â 10 #698 Posted June 7, 2014 The very name is a windup, South Yorkshire Safety Camera Partnership. Little to do with safety, much to do with collecting revenue. Â If the power wielders really wanted to make our roads "safe" then any one caught speeding should have their licence revoked, commensurate with their speed. Â 5 miles over the limit, a weeks ban, 10 miles over the limit a months ban, 15 miles over a 3 month ban, 20+ over a 1 year ban. Â Of course it's like fags, HMG get too much revenue from the ciggy smokers and the beleaguered driver to do much about it. Â Angel1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
SnailyBoy   10 #699 Posted June 7, 2014 The very name is a windup, South Yorkshire Safety Camera Partnership. Little to do with safety, much to do with collecting revenue. If the power wielders really wanted to make our roads "safe" then any one caught speeding should have their licence revoked, commensurate with their speed.  5 miles over the limit, a weeks ban, 10 miles over the limit a months ban, 15 miles over a 3 month ban, 20+ over a 1 year ban.  Of course it's like fags, HMG get too much revenue from the ciggy smokers and the beleaguered driver to do much about it.  Angel1  How about hitting speeders in the pocket and if they do it four times in a rolling period, give them a ban? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Penistone999 Â Â 10 #700 Posted June 7, 2014 How about hitting speeders in the pocket and if they do it four times in a rolling period, give them a ban? Â Or we could just do away with the draconian speed limits we have in this country and install sensible ones and stop treating motorists as cash cows. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Longcol   594 #701 Posted June 7, 2014 Or we could just do away with the draconian speed limits we have in this country and install sensible ones and stop treating motorists as cash cows.  Clearly someone has never driven on the continent where fines are usually on the spot. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
geared   302 #702 Posted June 7, 2014 6 fatalities, 19 serious injuries and 93 minor injuries in past five years might tell you otherwise. Lowering speed limit is proven to reduce the severity of injuries arising from collisions.  Can you think of abetter way of spending money than saving lives?  on that short space of road??  What on earth a people playing at?? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
SnailyBoy   10 #703 Posted June 7, 2014 Or we could just do away with the draconian speed limits we have in this country and install sensible ones and stop treating motorists as cash cows.  They need to learn to behave with the limits we already have. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Isiris   10 #704 Posted June 22, 2014 Do you not understand that these are average speed cameras that measure your speed over a length of road? You need cameras at the start and end of the length to be enforced, as well as at junctions where vehicles enter and leave the road being enforced. So of course they need a gantry near the roundabout, which I believe you will find has cameras which pick up vehicles heading in both directions.  And dont you understand English?  The cameras are recording the back of the car AS IT IT BREAKING for the roundabout so the speed will be reduced dramatically.  If it is to be affective and have an accurate read, it would be facing the oncoming traffic to register the speed as the cars approach. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Eater Sundae   12 #705 Posted June 22, 2014 (edited) And dont you understand English? The cameras are recording the back of the car AS IT IT BREAKING for the roundabout so the speed will be reduced dramatically.  If it is to be affective and have an accurate read, it would be facing the oncoming traffic to register the speed as the cars approach.  If you've driven the last half mile or so at around 60 mph, do you think that braking to, say, 30 mph over the last 50 yds or so is going to bring you within the 50 limit, as measured by the average speed cameras?  Edit. Ah, I think I understand where you are going wrong. As I understand it, the average speed cameras are not trying, in themselves, to measure speed. All they are doing is recording the time at which a vehicle passes them. They then compare this with the time that the same vehicle passed an earlier camera, at a known distance away, and work out the average speed of that vehicle between the two points. So, it doesn't matter whether the vehicle is braking or not, as the camera is not trying to measure its speed at that point in time. Edited June 23, 2014 by Eater Sundae Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...