bluecanary   13 #25 Posted November 21, 2011 Thanks for all the helpful answers. Sounds like surveyors are trying to cover themselves rather than ther being any real health risk! Sign of the times, I guess.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Aries22 Â Â 10 #26 Posted November 21, 2011 Make sure you keep your house warm, as my grandmothers house always had a burst pipe in winter. No central heating in those days. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
gnvqsos   10 #27 Posted November 21, 2011 Make sure you keep your house warm, as my grandmothers house always had a burst pipe in winter. No central heating in those days.  You can lag pipes cheaply. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
YorksWater   10 #28 Posted November 22, 2011 Every year, we take tens of thousands of clean water samples from across the region. Earlier this year, we started a programme of work to replace lead clean water communication pipes where levels of lead are above the new requirements, which will be applied from April 2013. We're only responsible for the section of pipe from the road up to the boundary of customers homes, so where we find lead supplies, we always tell customers and provide them with the contact details of a contractor in case they wish to replace their section.  We're investing £18million in Leeds replacing lead supply pipes as investigations have identified this as an area with a high number of lead pipes.  For more information this please visit - http://www.yorkshirewater.com/your-water-services/local-improvements/improving-your-water-quality/lead-pipe-replacement.aspx Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Jeffrey Shaw   90 #29 Posted November 22, 2011 So are you stating (authoritatively) that lead pipes in Sheffield are- or are not- potentially dangerous? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
gnvqsos   10 #30 Posted November 22, 2011 So are you stating (authoritatively) that lead pipes in Sheffield are- or are not- potentially dangerous?  What danger do you foresee? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Jeffrey Shaw   90 #31 Posted November 22, 2011 Ingestion of lead/mercury/cadmium can cause severe and irreparable illnesses (remember Minimata?) I do not 'foresee' anything, but YW might reasonably have information rather more accurate than any other SF members! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
bluecanary   13 #32 Posted November 23, 2011 JefffreyShaw - Can I just raise the question I asked in my earlier post:  Your post implies that the health risks are real and significant. I'm not necesarily disagreeing with you, but if this is the case, does this not mean that a large proportion of the population of Sheffield, let alone many other cities and towns throughout the country, are at risk of lead poisoning? Why hasn't there been a public outcry/awareness campaign if this is the case? Are there actually documented cases of lead poisoning that can be attributed to this issue?  Until recently, it was common for people to live in the same houses all their lives, so exposure would have occurred over many decades. I would have thought there would be many examples resulting from long term exposure if the risk was really significant.  In response to your question to YWater, I'm obviously not privy to the same information they have, but I do know that it's scientifically impossible to prove beyond the shadow of a doubt that ANYTHING is 100% safe. All we can do is make an informed judgement based on the evidence that we have. So to the best of your knowledge, have there been outbreaks of lead poisoning caused by the presence of lead in domestic water pipes in this country? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Jeffrey Shaw   90 #33 Posted November 23, 2011 As I'm neither a doctor nor a specialist in metal poisoning, I'm afraid that I cannot answer your question (valid though it is). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
dan2802 Â Â 53 #34 Posted November 23, 2011 Thanks for all the helpful answers. Sounds like surveyors are trying to cover themselves rather than ther being any real health risk! Sign of the times, I guess.... Â Correct. Surveyors are a nightmare with the housing market at the moment. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Bruce_Shark   10 #35 Posted November 23, 2011 As I'm neither a doctor nor a specialist in metal poisoning, I'm afraid that I cannot answer your question (valid though it is).  Now this is obviously true, but do you think that the increased interest in this field by certain sections of the law community may lead to an additional financial burden on this sector?  Additionally, do you foresee any potential increase in financial burden will be solely be born by vendors, or might this impact on the subsequent sale price, and a further increase which has to be born by the purchaser?  Finally, if this additional financial strain on all parties is out of all proportion to the supposed "health benefits" or "risks", will those same self interested sections of the law community still sleep well at night? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
dan2802 Â Â 53 #36 Posted November 23, 2011 Lawyers jumping on a band wagon to make money, what ever next? Sorry Jeffrey. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...