size13   10 #97 Posted September 11, 2011 Hi Mr Ming There you go, a fine example of a useless degree. Useless in the sense, ie one does not take a degree in order to take a pay cut = FACT  really? i know someone who was a well paid accountant, but hated it and retrained as a teacher. im not aware of their respective pay grades, but id guess being a teacher is less paid than an accountant?  surely its about doing what you love doing, rather than chasing the £? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Stamen   10 #98 Posted September 11, 2011 hahahaha, you stole that from somewhere too. You don't have a degree either, I take it?  No I do not. My qualification is of a higher standard that the degrees of today however as the standards have been significantly reduced in order to allow the lesser academic to be able to get a degree. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
littlebasher   11 #99 Posted September 11, 2011 Hi Mr Ming There you go, a fine example of a useless degree. Useless in the sense, ie one does not take a degree in order to take a pay cut = FACT  True enough in the short term, but subsequent jobs have required one.  Although, nobody ever bothered verifying that I had one, so I may have well said I had a doctorate. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
LDeville   10 #100 Posted September 11, 2011 True enough in the short term, but subsequent jobs have required one. Although, nobody ever bothered verifying that I had one, so I may have well said I had a doctorate.  A factual point indeed.  Many London boroughs don't look at an certificates unless they are social workers/accountants. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Helga   10 #101 Posted September 12, 2011 I dont think its anyones business to look down on certain degrees, as long as the person has taken a degree that they enjoy/have a future career plan with and achieve a decent mark it doesnt matter. Some may say my zoology degree is useless, why didnt i just take straight biology? Because both would lead me to be a teacher anyway, and i enjoy the specifics of a more specialized subject.  just an aside really. But I was told the other day that there are no zoology degrees any more, or rather that they have been re-branded as animal science. Botany is now plant science apparently. Is this true? and if so I think it is a shame. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Helga   10 #102 Posted September 12, 2011 (edited) Hi Mr Ming There you go, a fine example of a useless degree. Useless in the sense, ie one does not take a degree in order to take a pay cut = FACT  But that suggests that people take degrees to improve their income in the short term. That would not generally be such a good strategy unless it was highly vocational. e.g. law, medicine, accountancy. Many people do it for the pleasure of learning or to improve their prospects and opportunities over the long term. Lots of degrees are only the starting point and a good grade would be required in your first degree to enable you to progress to either vocational or academic post-graduate qualifications.  Why are people putting the word fact in capital letters at the end of sentences that are clearly not factual or statistical but mere opinion? Edited September 12, 2011 by Helga Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Bladesman   10 #103 Posted September 12, 2011 Too many meaningless degrees I must agree BUT more to the point is I think some students need some direction on what to choose that will lead to a career. Not always being pushed down the university route necessarily which is all schools do.  I know enough people right now who have plucked the easiest uni degrees they can do and cant wait to get to uni for a good 2 to 3 year drinking binge. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
salsafan   10 #104 Posted September 13, 2011 just an aside really. But I was told the other day that there are no zoology degrees any more, or rather that they have been re-branded as animal science. Botany is now plant science apparently. Is this true? and if so I think it is a shame. No, that is not true. I just met a Cambridge graduate who finished her Zoology Degree and worked in a Zoo. She also got a job offer there, but felt too isolated from her family and friends, so she moved back home closer to family, in another job in a zoo. The zoo that she worked in just outside Cambridge had a breeding programme for some rare animal type, and in a global collaboration to try and increase the numbers. I found that fascinating, AND altruistic. It is not all about money. The girl really has a gift for animals as well, cos she can tame them so. She just have that natural sense with animals.  Reading this thread just brings back memories. Not everybody just works for money. There is definitely a different sense of reality here.  I agree with Max on the fact that university degrees are based on the demand of the industry. Event Management is now big business. Obviously matching the graduates TO the jobs are a different kettle of fish altogether. Not getting those jobs in the first couple of years before the market moves on is also another problem. Nobody teaches you these kind of things, even though your careers advisory dept in the university tries to match you up with a job, those positions are also still limited. Each industry moves on. Time waits for no-one.  There are no "meaningless" degrees. Just meaningless people, and meaningless blurbs online. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Helga   10 #105 Posted September 13, 2011 No, that is not true. I just met a Cambridge graduate who finished her Zoology Degree and worked in a Zoo.  How interesting. It was a friend from Cambridge Uni telling me this, although he didn't say that it was the case at Cambridge so perhaps he was referring to outside of Oxbridge. I'm not surprised that Cambridge has held onto it as they tend to be less swayed by the political climate and more influenced by tradition in these kind of things.   There are no "meaningless" degrees. Just meaningless people, and meaningless blurbs online.  Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
salsafan   10 #106 Posted September 13, 2011 (edited)  The diplomatic way is:  "Oh, I did not know that Salsafan. Thank you for clarifying the point that Zoology still exists as a degree in UK universities. This is interesting indeed."  *Courtesy* *Smiles*   Helga, I apologise for being so verbose on my previous paragraph. I was not actually aware that you took offence, until you reacted to my post. I did not mean to imply that your actual post was meaningless. I did mean to imply that some posts on this thread that was criticising decent graduates in attempting to better themselves as really meaningless. As it is nobody's concerns but the graduates themselves. Edited September 13, 2011 by salsafan Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
max   13 #107 Posted September 13, 2011 <snip> Why are people putting the word fact in capital letters at the end of sentences that are clearly not factual or statistical but mere opinion?  Presumably because they didn't get a good education so cannot distinguish between fact and opinion. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
mwacuk   10 #108 Posted April 1, 2013 I don't have a degree and after running a company for several years, I'm finding in recruitment that degrees hold far less weight than job experience.  So this degree snobbery aside; imagine you run a company and two applicants send you a cv; both are 25 years old.  Applicant 1: Left school/college, went to uni and worked part time at tesco.  Applicant 2: Left school/college, worked at tesco, worked in an office job, then worked as a junior in the field you require for 3 years.  A large corporate ingrained with a graduate snobbery post grad scheme would fall head over heals for applicant 1 when Applicant 2 is obviously the better person for the job.  Any SME or even a larger firm with a tight grip with how the real world works would almost certainly go for Applicant 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...