karl101 Â Â 10 #1 Posted April 17, 2011 The River Rivlen, One with an ND 3.0 filter, another without... Any opinions? Â Â Â K. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Strix   11 #2 Posted April 17, 2011 the top one looks a bit too 80's airbrushy - is there anything you could do to tone that down? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
karl101 Â Â 10 #3 Posted April 17, 2011 (edited) the top one looks a bit too 80's airbrushy - is there anything you could do to tone that down? Â That's mostly how it came out of the camera, I've adjusted the white balance and exposure slightly to try and match the second photo. But I see what you mean. Â K. Edited April 17, 2011 by karl101 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Strix   11 #4 Posted April 17, 2011 when I look at the second one, I can hear the surges in the torrents of water, but the first is hissing, and appears to be missing a unicorn or purple dragon... or perhaps a druid with a staff...  what was the effect you were aiming for? what were you hoping to convey to the viewer? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
SV500   10 #5 Posted April 17, 2011 I prefare the top one,as the lower is what you'd see if you were standing there,Maybe a shorter exposure would loose a little of the misty effect,but its a good pic   JJ.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
REPO MAN Â Â 10 #6 Posted April 17, 2011 both nice shots, prefer 1st one though, yes this type of water pic has been done to death but it takes a bit of know how to do it well, you have done it well. Â Â RM:) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
johno   10 #7 Posted April 18, 2011 I like them both but if i had to choose one to put on my wall it would be the second one Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
corkneyfonz   10 #8 Posted April 19, 2011 Very nice, karl, first one for me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
karl101   10 #9 Posted April 21, 2011 Thanks for the comments, very interesting. I know the photo's a bit of a cliché, but the first is a more technically challenging.  K. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Ryedo40 Â Â 10 #10 Posted April 21, 2011 Both are nice. Although think I prefer the 1st one because it has an almost magical appearance. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Number Six   10 #11 Posted April 21, 2011 If you don't have an ND filter, you can get a similar effect by taking a number of normal images and stacking them in PS.  You can use the same technique to reduce noise too.  Just thought it might be of interest.  http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/image-averaging-noise.htm Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
rachks   10 #12 Posted April 21, 2011 If you don't have an ND filter, you can get a similar effect by taking a number of normal images and stacking them in PS.  or take them in lower light with >1 sec exposure  forgot to add, 1st is my fav as well... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...