Plain Talker   11 #1 Posted July 16, 2010 The ruling has just been handed down.  He must spend the rest of his natural life in gaol....  Sorted. it's a result:- and a good one. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
BettyBooHoo! Â Â 10 #2 Posted July 16, 2010 And so he should. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Plain Talker   11 #3 Posted July 16, 2010 As I said above, It's a good result, especially for the families of the women he attacked and murdered. Justice has been done. So, sometimes, the Law is not such an ass.  I am pleased that he will not be permitted to see light of day again.  He got 20 life sentences for Murder, and Attempt-Murder (13 for Murder, 7 for attempt)  If he lives another 10 years, he'll have served 40 years. That's still only 2 years each, for every charge he was convicted of. but it's a start. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
BettyBooHoo! Â Â 10 #4 Posted July 16, 2010 Couldn't agree more. There was no other result in my eyes. He should never be released, ever. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Bedders   10 #5 Posted July 16, 2010 For once in this soft justice system we have to put up with.....justice has prevailed!  It's the correct decision! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
HeadingNorth   11 #6 Posted July 16, 2010 I wonder if the people who complained that he shouldn't be given a tariff will now withdraw that complaint. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Plain Talker   11 #7 Posted July 16, 2010 I wonder if the people who complained that he shouldn't be given a tariff will now withdraw that complaint.  He has his tarriff, now. Sorted.  (I don't doubt that he's very swiftly going to find something else to mither about, and try to take action over. His soup to hot, perhaps? salad too cold? ) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
boyfriday   21 #8 Posted July 16, 2010 Couldn't agree more. There was no other result in my eyes. He should never be released, ever.  Yes, I agree-it was the procedure that was being followed, the outcome was never in doubt.  Have a nice rest of your life Mr Sutcliffe! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
*Ryan* Â Â 11 #9 Posted July 16, 2010 It wasn't warranted anyhow, anyone thats killed that many people shouldnt be released. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Plain Talker   11 #10 Posted July 16, 2010 It wasn't warranted anyhow, anyone thats killed that many people shouldnt be released.  no argument, there.  One person, killed in the heat of the moment? perhaps the murderer won't pose a danger once released.  Calculated, multiple murders, as per what Sutcliffe did? no release. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Bedders   10 #11 Posted July 16, 2010 no argument, there. One person, killed in the heat of the moment? perhaps the murderer won't pose a danger once released.  Calculated, multiple murders, as per what Sutcliffe did? no release.  If it was a 'heat of the moment' sort of thing it would probably be manslaughter which is totally different from murder.  There is no 'heat of the moment' murder! It's got the necessary element of 'Mens Rea'....(Guilty mind) and so premeditated!  See Actus Reus & Mens Rea. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
mj.scuba   10 #12 Posted July 16, 2010 Good decision itself, if only the criminal justice system could show it's teeth a little more often. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...