Amaranthus   10 #97 Posted July 2, 2010 Well if you ask me it's completely pants on head retarded, god must be the worst designer ever. You're saying the soul is where all of our thoughts and personality is right? Now let's consider a couple of things:  If souls exist, they are not physical, that means they are indestructible.  Brains are very destructible, they are all squishy and soft.  Why on earth, considering that God had apparently already designed souls to perform the functions of our mind, would he make it so that the only way to use a soul is through an incredibly delicate lump of squishy organic matter that can easily be ruined?  Why did God give us 2 arms when 4 would be sooo much more useful? Why can't we regrow limbs like certain amphibians? Why why why?  I am not God, nor do I understand anything about Him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Amaranthus   10 #98 Posted July 2, 2010 This is the point when I agree with you, we have nothing further to discuss. You have nothing to bring to this debate except superstition.  Hey jimmy, I thought that all any of us were bringing to this debate was opinion. No need to get nasty. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
discodown   11 #99 Posted July 2, 2010 Why did God give us 2 arms when 4 would be sooo much more useful? Why can't we regrow limbs like certain amphibians? Why why why?  I am not God, nor do I understand anything about Him. You seem to be much closer than us Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Majestic   10 #100 Posted July 2, 2010 Why did God give us 2 arms when 4 would be sooo much more useful? Why can't we regrow limbs like certain amphibians? Why why why?  I am not God, nor do I understand anything about Him.  It is good that you fully realise that God is male and as such superior. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Cyclone   10 #101 Posted July 2, 2010 No it doesn't. But lets not get into all that on this thread. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/wildlife/5577724/Moth-turns-from-black-to-white-as-Britains-polluted-skies-change-colour.html  The most famous modern example.  The only way you can not believe that evolution is occurring now is to wilfully ignore the examples and evidence. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
flamingjimmy   10 #102 Posted July 2, 2010 Why did God give us 2 arms when 4 would be sooo much more useful? Why can't we regrow limbs like certain amphibians? Why why why? THe simplest explanation by far to those questions is that god does not exist and we were not designed. It's so blindingly obvious I'm astounded a seemingly intelligent person such as yourself couldn't realise it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Cyclone   10 #103 Posted July 2, 2010 Hey jimmy, I thought that all any of us were bringing to this debate was opinion. No need to get nasty.  When the opinion is clearly out of step with reality what's the point of bothering. You can just assume to every question that the answer is 'because god wanted it to be that way' and get on with some praying or something. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
dodger1 Â Â 10 #104 Posted July 2, 2010 It demonstratively does. Â here he go's!! everybody shut up. the dyson cleaner's right again:heyhey: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Amaranthus   10 #105 Posted July 2, 2010 When the opinion is clearly out of step with reality what's the point of bothering. You can just assume to every question that the answer is 'because god wanted it to be that way' and get on with some praying or something.  And you and jimmy can get to reading this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
flamingjimmy   10 #106 Posted July 2, 2010 Hey jimmy, I thought that all any of us were bringing to this debate was opinion. No need to get nasty.  I didn't think I was being nasty.  You said you're self "a lot of my argument comes from what I believe in, of which I cannot provide you with proof"  A superstition is a belief that is held without proof, or knowledge, or evidence. Therefore, you don't have anything to bring to this debate apart from superstition. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Amaranthus   10 #107 Posted July 2, 2010 I didn't think I was being nasty. You said you're self "a lot of my argument comes from what I believe in, of which I cannot provide you with proof"  A superstition is a belief that is held without proof, or knowledge, or evidence. Therefore, you don't have anything to bring to this debate apart from superstition.  In your opinion. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Majestic   10 #108 Posted July 2, 2010 ON NO! It looks like this is going to turn into yet another God Botherers thread, despite my attempts to derail that happening. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...