Jump to content

The (former) Princess Diana megathread

Diana gets a public inquest. What are your views?  

103 members have voted

  1. 1. Diana gets a public inquest. What are your views?

    • Yes, legally there should be one
      28
    • Waist of time and money
      31
    • It's all a bit fishy
      13
    • Al Fayed is mad as a fish
      31


Recommended Posts

I don't think she was killed or even care for one second that she isn't alive any longer.

 

However the motive if one is needed is patently clear.

 

Prince Harry looks exactly like James Hewitt did at his age. If you've ever seen the two photographs side by side their facial structure, skin tone, hair colour and consistence are virtually the same. The similarities a far to great to avoid questioning whether James Hewitt, whom is known to have had a affair with Princess Diana is the biological father of Prince Harry.

 

James Hewitt also possesses several letters from Diana that he keeps locked in a vault which he describes as his 'pension' as he believes their value is so great he can live off their sale. It doesn't take a genius to make the connection between the similarities and what is contained within the letters.

 

Princess Diana has humiliated the Royal family by doing this, the third in line to the throne is a bast ard love child. She had also humiliated the whole nation.

 

We are far better off now that Charles has married Camilla and the succession of the head of state looks more stable. If the monarchy was destabilised it would lose support quickly and a referendum would soon ensue as the political parties, especially New Labour jumped on the bandwagon.

 

P.S I don’t agree with a royal family, but another tier of politicians vying for the position of President every four years is even less appealing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sorry Starsparkle, if you read my post, the theory is about Dodi Fayed not Henri Paul :)

 

It was a very credible theory, with evidence that he was involved with Arab arms dealers, and that at the time of the crash they were travelling to a meeting with said dealers, which it is now thought may have been a 'staged' meeting, to make sure they went a specific route in the car.

 

oops, sorry Twiglet, you are quite right - I should have read your post a bit more carefully....

 

But it doesn't change anything - I don't believe Dodi was the target either. If he had been, then there are surely much easier ways of doing away with him, than deliberately doing it in the full glare of in-depth and never-intending interest from the entire world's media.

 

And some of the things that happened that night - all the cameras around where the accident occurred just 'happened' to be out of order that night; the ambulance taking 2 hours or something to reach the hospital when it's highly possible Diana could have been saved if she'd reached specialist care sooner; the mix-ups at the morgue involving Henri Paul's blood samples; the unusual step of embalming of Diana's body which can affect the results of an autopsy;etc etc. There are other examples I could give. Let's face it, some degree of official sanction would be required to get away with those things, which would only have been forthcoming had Diana been the target.

 

StarSparkle

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not this old chestnut again - Donuticus, it has been done to death before now that Henri Paul was NOT drunk - how much repetition of this fact does it take to get it into people's heads?

 

StarSparkle

 

The tests indicate original post-mortem samples, which showed Henri Paul was three times over the French drink-drive limit, were accurate and were his.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The tests indicate original post-mortem samples, which showed Henri Paul was three times over the French drink-drive limit, were accurate and were his.

 

The original post-mortem samples were believed to have been contaminated with samples from another body in the morgue that night, a man who HAD been drink driving.

 

As Henri Paul's body was conveniently cremated, against the express wishes of his parents, there was no way to obtain further, uncontaminated samples.

 

StarSparkle

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The tests indicate original post-mortem samples, which showed Henri Paul was three times over the French drink-drive limit, were accurate and were his.

It has recently been proven, by using modern electro-spectography techniques, and analysing ancient texts, that the name "Halibut" is a direct translation of "Harry Opposite"

This is unlikely, however to be mentioned in the forthcoming report. :hihi:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

the unusual step of embalming of Diana's body which can affect the results of an autopsy

 

Before I refute these things I will again state that I'm not blowing any entire theories out of the water just want to clear up a few facts.

 

When repatriating a body from on country to another, it is necessary to produce an embalming certificate. Thus it was absolutely normal practice for her body to have been embalmed after having undergone an autopsy in France, and to do otherwise would require a massive amount of red tape and has in fact proved impossible for the familes of people who have been murdered in other countries.

 

As Henri Paul's body was conveniently cremated, against the express wishes of his parents, there was no way to obtain further, uncontaminated samples.

 

Whilst it is true he was cremated and further samples cannot be taken, the samples in the lab which still exist have been thoroughly DNA tested several times over and proved to consist only of Henri Paul's blood.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
When repatriating a body from on country to another, it is necessary to produce an embalming certificate. Thus it was absolutely normal practice for her body to have been embalmed after having undergone an autopsy in France, and to do otherwise would require a massive amount of red tape and has in fact proved impossible for the familes of people who have been murdered in other countries.

 

I simply don't believe this would be the case for someone of Diana's importance. It was surely obvious to the French that the British authorities SHOULD want to carry out their own autopsy on her, especially with her death having occurred under such suspicious circumstances. In the event, the treatment given to the body by the French authorities made a British autopsy impossible.

 

StarSparkle

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It has recently been proven, by using modern electro-spectography techniques, and analysing ancient texts, that the name "Halibut" is a direct translation of "Harry Opposite"

This is unlikely, however to be mentioned in the forthcoming report. :hihi:

 

Ah, 'Confused ' of Hipperholme. 'tis you again. Touche, since also unlikely to be mentioned in the report is the

 

''In my opinion I am the greatest person on this planet, others are mere also rans.'' / ''The worst face that a person can put to the world is one of self angrandisment.'' (sic)

 

debacle, which according to the latest 'drunk drivers are extremely safe' technology reveals an outstanding inability to recognise the difference between elbow and rear end.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The original post-mortem samples were believed to have been contaminated with samples from another body in the morgue that night, a man who HAD been drink driving.

 

As Henri Paul's body was conveniently cremated, against the express wishes of his parents, there was no way to obtain further, uncontaminated samples.

 

StarSparkle

 

Even if he wasn't drunk it is still highly possible that anyone driving a car at 80 mph in city will crash and passengers not wearing seatbelts will die.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Even if he wasn't drunk it is still highly possible that anyone driving a car at 80 mph in city will crash and passengers not wearing seatbelts will die.

He was drunk. It's only conspiracy nuts that believe otherwise, but indeed Longcol, your post makes sense. Was it not also the case that Mr Paul was taking antidepressant medication at the time?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So the driver was three times over the limit, suffering from the effects of anti depressant, and dont forget had exceedingly high levels of CO in his blood. It seems unlikely that he was killed in the crash. He sounds as if he was on his deathbed already.

This result is the biggest load of tosh I have ever heard.

If people believe stuff like that, then no wonder the con men manage to rip so many people off each day.

Gullible is not the word for it, something like Albatrossible would be better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I simply don't believe this would be the case for someone of Diana's importance. It was surely obvious to the French that the British authorities SHOULD want to carry out their own autopsy on her, especially with her death having occurred under such suspicious circumstances. In the event, the treatment given to the body by the French authorities made a British autopsy impossible.

 

StarSparkle

 

At the time, the circumstances were not all that suspicious. Even if there was some suspicion as to the cause of the crash, another autopsy would reveal nothing more than the original, i.e. that she died from severe injuries related to the crash. What made her more important than anybody else who is unfortunate enough to die in another country, especially if they are obviously murdered? Admittedly if the immediate thought was that she was assassinated then British pathologists would have been flown over to perform another autopsy, but international law is exactly that and it isn't going to be flouted for anybody (apart from political leaders in all probablility).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.