Jump to content

Should life mean life?

SHOULD LIFE MEAN LIFE?  

85 members have voted

  1. 1. SHOULD LIFE MEAN LIFE?



Recommended Posts

And it would stop being given as a sentence.

 

---------- Post added 19-10-2017 at 08:37 ----------

 

 

Strangely enough it also feels like talking to a brick wall from this side.

Fair trial or not (and fair doesn't always mean either fair or the correct verdict) it's still killing. It's still the same outcome.

Of course it wouldn't stop being given, there's people inside now that will never be released.

As for a soul,its the same as a god,something nobody can find.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What actually is a persons soul? :huh:

Must you be religious to believe we have souls?

 

There's a few on here all with the first initial....R.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Of course it wouldn't stop being given, there's people inside now that will never be released.

True; and it would not 'stop being given' if-as in the case of a murder conviction- the sentence remains mandatory.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Of course it wouldn't stop being given, there's people inside now that will never be released.

As for a soul,its the same as a god,something nobody can find.

 

No, it wouldn't entirely stop.

It would be used massively less though, as the majority of people given "life" are in reality given 30 years and will actually serve 15 with good behaviour.

Judges don't accidentally give that tariff, juries don't accidentally convict knowing that that's the likely sentence. So if it meant something different then juries and judges would behave differently.

 

---------- Post added 24-10-2017 at 18:43 ----------

 

True; and it would not 'stop being given' if-as in the case of a murder conviction- the sentence remains mandatory.

 

That would influence the likelihood of conviction and probably thus the charge that the CPS would choose to bring.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, ANGELFIRE1 said:

" David McGreavy spent 46 years in prison for the murder of siblings Paul Ralph, four, Dawn, two, and nine-month-old Samantha in 1973 at their home in Worcester, where McGreavy was a lodger. He impaled their bodies on the iron railings of a neighbour’s fence. The only explanation he gave was that Samantha would not stop crying. "

 

Apparently the actions of ending the life of the three children were quite gruesome as well, best not to be explained on the forum.

 

Here is the question, should this piece of human detritus have been released from jail, or should he have languished inside until his demise. My choice, demise. 

 

The children's mothers pain is for life.

 

Angel1.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.