toploader   10 #37 Posted September 3, 2009 It's not worth making yourself ill over this.  At worst, it's a VERY minor speeding offence. 3 points and 60 quid.  Millions of us have done it, stop beating yourself up about it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
hstephuk   10 #38 Posted September 3, 2009 By law they have to issue the ticket within 14 days  do they? ahh ok, only a fortnight with worry then!!! thank you Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
hstephuk   10 #39 Posted September 3, 2009 It's not worth making yourself ill over this. At worst, it's a VERY minor speeding offence. 3 points and 60 quid.  Millions of us have done it, stop beating yourself up about it.  thank you, im a worrier!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
myriad   10 #40 Posted September 3, 2009 I detest these cameras, they serve no purpose other than as revenue raisers. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
hstephuk   10 #41 Posted September 3, 2009 I detest these cameras, they serve no purpose other than as revenue raisers.  true! i think they are dangerous too, people suddenly breaking when they see them on a motorway - pure danger!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Cynic   10 #42 Posted September 4, 2009 I detest these cameras, they serve no purpose other than as revenue raisers.  To be fair these one do serve a purpose. There are often people working the other side of the cones and the lanes are much narrower than normal. Making people travel at 50 is far safer than letting people carry on at about 80. The restriction could be lifted when nobody is working but that would mean covering all the signs which waste a lot of time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Cynic   10 #43 Posted September 4, 2009 true! i think they are dangerous too, people suddenly breaking when they see them on a motorway - pure danger!!!  There are signs at about a mile and half a mile before the restriction to give people lots of warning. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Number Six   10 #44 Posted September 4, 2009 true! i think they are dangerous too, people suddenly breaking when they see them on a motorway - pure danger!!!  If only people understood the word 'average' ... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Paul2412 Â Â 10 #45 Posted September 4, 2009 Put it this way, if its late at night (dark) and they don't flash how would they be able to pick the reg plate up? I wouldn't worry if I was you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
HotPhil   10 #46 Posted September 4, 2009 Put it this way, if its late at night (dark) and they don't flash how would they be able to pick the reg plate up? I wouldn't worry if I was you.As earlier, these ones don't flash and have two infrared spotlights either side of each camera to see in the dark. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Grandad.Malky   11 #47 Posted September 4, 2009 I detest these cameras, they serve no purpose other than as revenue raisers.  What about helping to protected those working on the road and other drivers that maybe effected by speeding motorists driving where there are narrow lanes, adverse cambers and sudden lane changes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
alexm08   10 #48 Posted September 4, 2009 Please do make yourself ill over this.  This is a horrific offence  Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...