Tess   10 #13 Posted September 2, 2009 Yeah I went at the weekend and thought it was brilliant. Almost entirely subtitled and some bits you know you shouldn't laugh at but can't help it! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Gypsy Hack   10 #14 Posted September 2, 2009 If you want to know a bit more about how WW2 played out, it's an excellent place to start. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Halibut   12 #15 Posted September 2, 2009 If you want to know a bit more about how WW2 played out, it's an excellent place to start.  I think not, since it's heavily fictionalised. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Gypsy Hack   10 #16 Posted September 2, 2009 I think not, since it's heavily fictionalised.I think your irony meter needs a new battery. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Halibut   12 #17 Posted September 2, 2009 I think your irony meter needs a new battery.  You're quite right - you did that too deadpan for me to pick up, damnit! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
chem1st   10 #18 Posted September 2, 2009 I started watching it online, but got bored, tbf I thought it was a bit crap, so I stopped watching after 50 minutes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
pattricia   574 #19 Posted September 2, 2009 It got terrible reviews in the newspapers, and I hear theve now taken the second word out of the title . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
neeeeeeeeeek   10 #20 Posted September 2, 2009 It got terrible reviews in the newspapers, and I hear theve now taken the second word out of the title .  Depends what paper you read and the title has not changed, it's just sensored in some forms of media. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
pattricia   574 #21 Posted September 2, 2009 Depends what paper you read and the title has not changed, it's just sensored in some forms of media.  Oh, I see sorry. I wonder why its sensored when its spelt like that? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Beakerzoid   10 #22 Posted September 2, 2009 Depends what paper you read and the title has not changed, it's just sensored in some forms of media.  Indeed. With an 88% rating on Rotten Tomatoes (out of 229 reviews from media and critics only 27 rated it low), it certainly hasn't been getting many bad reviews.  The dropping of the second word in the title was for the pre-publicity on TV and radio, much in the same way that Austin Powers The Spy Who Shagged Me was adjusted for such media. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Beakerzoid   10 #23 Posted September 2, 2009 Oh, I see sorry. I wonder why its sensored when its spelt like that?  It is to do with it still sounding offensive. The mis-spelling in the title allows it to be printed and displayed, but the voice-over on adverts etc is another matter...hence the editing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...