Trabant   10 #1705 Posted February 15, 2007 If you want to know more about the science of dust / lens / flaws / aberrations then please check out the link in my sig. Priceless. Truly priceless. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Zaytsev   10 #1706 Posted February 15, 2007 Ah yes, J Edgar Hoover.  Wasn't he the one that failed to find a communist conspiracy to take over the USA despite arresting half the country and dismally failing to manage to cover up his covert tactics while running the FBI??   NEXT!  He also dressed as a woman, stockings, suspenders. the whole nine yards in his spare time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Zaytsev   10 #1707 Posted February 16, 2007 Popular Mechanics, debunks each of the conspiracy theories and make far more sense doing so than spouting about 'orbs'  Debunked Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
ann_a   10 #1708 Posted February 16, 2007 FYTC...lol,now that IS funny:hihi: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
ann_a   10 #1709 Posted February 16, 2007 Night....lol Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Thunzi   10 #1710 Posted February 16, 2007 Popular Mechanics, debunks each of the conspiracy theories and make far more sense doing so than spouting about 'orbs' Debunked Thanks for sharing that FYTC, it's a very interesting read. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Longcol   577 #1711 Posted February 16, 2007 Thanks for sharing that FYTC, it's a very interesting read.  Same here - have bookmarked - although it doesn't explain the alien on the grassy knoll flying Shergar into the White House. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
ann_a   10 #1712 Posted February 16, 2007 Hang on a minute..I think my question was..how easy would it be for that particular footage to be manipulated. As for Popular Mechanics,will get back to that too,even tho'it's been posted before...but right still not feeling too good. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Longcol   577 #1713 Posted February 16, 2007 Hang on a minute..I think my question was..how easy would it be for that particular footage to be manipulated. As for Popular Mechanics,will get back to that too,even tho'it's been posted before...but right still not feeling too good.  I think it much more likely to be misinterpreted than have been manipulated - but manipulating video hardly rocket science in this day and age. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Zaytsev   10 #1714 Posted February 16, 2007 Oh my god I take it all back.  Just found this link I think it needs some explaining quite obviously been 'manipulated'. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
angle20   10 #1715 Posted February 17, 2007 BBC2 programme this Sunday 18th (might have to tape it as it clashes with the new Lewis (Inspector Morse) series!):  http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/conspiracy_files/6160775.stm  Incredibly some believe the American Government allowed or actively helped the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
ann_a   10 #1716 Posted February 17, 2007 Thanks angle20,not to missed. Longcol.."it's hardly rocket science"...so? I have never had call to use it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...