barny_100   10 #1609 Posted October 16, 2006 if this is true, why only a very small hole in the building?? if infact the plane did hit the building why no parts of the plane, why no black box?? why not a bigger hole??  your questions leave a lot to be desired:huh:  Pentagon Attack Simulation  Anyone that see's that, reads the official documents (As I have) listing and recording hundreds of eye witnesses as to what happened and still goes is beyond help in more ways than one.  As for this oft repeated "The hole was too small!" line the Pentagon was designed to be extremely strong (Kevlar reinforment etc etc), so the wings couldn't penetrate as they are just bits of aluminium and so folded into the impact zone. Anyone expecting a cartoon like outline of a plane is merely parading their ignorance. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
KenH   10 #1610 Posted October 16, 2006 Pentagon Attack Simulation Anyone that see's that, reads the official documents (As I have) listing and recording hundreds of eye witnesses as to what happened and still goes is beyond help in more ways than one. .   They don't even have to go to the great effort of reading a few documents, all they hve to do is look back a few pages and they will find links to simulations of the attack and lots of pictures of bits of broken aircraft. They will also find the video of a witness saying it looked like cruise missile (now used by all the fruitcake sites in that form) along with the full version of what he saw where he tells us it was an airliner. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
nick2   10 #1611 Posted October 16, 2006 They will also find the video of a witness saying it looked like cruise missile  like most of the "general public" can tell you what a cruise missile looks like Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
KenH   10 #1612 Posted October 16, 2006 like most of the "general public" can tell you what a cruise missile looks like  The person in question probably could. However, the point was that he said something like "I saw this airliner fly past me really low and crash into the Pentagon, it was like cruise missile". This was then broadcast by CNN as only "it was like a cruise missile". Then all the crackpots watched only the highly edited version and, along with what appears to be a small hole, decided it was a missile. Afterwards we have people simply lying when they say there was no aircraft debris (it was covered in debris) and the crackpots take this at face value without checking. I wonder what would have happened if he had said "I saw an airliner fly oevr and hit the pentagon, it was like a Korean nuclear rocket". Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Sierra   22 #1613 Posted October 16, 2006 Did anyone see the South Park 9/11 conspiracy episode last week? I watched it at my sister's house, and my niece and I were laughing so hard we were gasping.  South Park Studios. Scroll down, it's the Mystery of the Urinal Deuce. And like most South Park episodes, it has something to offend everyone, so beware.  Sierra Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Tony   10 #1614 Posted October 16, 2006 As it's de rigour for proof positive, let's have a few links shall we? Just for fun you understand ...  The Truth About 9/11 Conspiracy Theories by Cinnamon Stillwell Why Do People Believe Conspiracy Theories? Here's the BBC's take on Why we need conspiracy theories Scientific American also has a few things to say too. Wikipedia's take on Conspiracy Theory And possibly the most uncomfortable of all, Conspiracy Theory from Source Watch  Finally, Conspiracy Theories Explained from Psychology Today. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Twiglet   10 #1615 Posted October 16, 2006 Do any of the conspiracy theories account for the presence of the bodies of passengers of flight 77 still sitting in their seats in the rubble of the Pentagon? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Bartfarst   10 #1616 Posted October 16, 2006 Pentagon Attack Simulation Anyone that see's that, reads the official documents (As I have) listing and recording hundreds of eye witnesses as to what happened and still goes is beyond help in more ways than one.  As for this oft repeated "The hole was too small!" line the Pentagon was designed to be extremely strong (Kevlar reinforment etc etc), so the wings couldn't penetrate as they are just bits of aluminium and so folded into the impact zone. Anyone expecting a cartoon like outline of a plane is merely parading their ignorance. Now that has to explain even the most naive of muppetry on this thread. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
nightwish   10 #1617 Posted January 7, 2007 just watched a 2 hour film at work come home and found this on the net about 9-11 give it a go:huh: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Phanerothyme   12 #1618 Posted January 7, 2007 found what on the net exactly? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
nightwish   10 #1619 Posted January 7, 2007 just watched a 2 hour film at work come home and found this on the net about 9-11 give it a go:huh: http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/pentagone/erreurs_en.htm Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Phanerothyme   12 #1620 Posted January 7, 2007 oh man that has been done to death. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...