retep Posted June 29, 2009 Posted June 29, 2009 Erm... I think we are. There are a lot of things Nick Griffin never mentions. It's answers like these that lead to answers like this, Pathetic. If I had my way, I'd base Griffin in Westminster so MPs would see his smug face walking past every day. He is a reminder of THEIR failure to reach out to forgotten voters. Their failure to grapple with difficult subjects.
Wildcat Posted June 29, 2009 Posted June 29, 2009 IT'S been three weeks since the BNP's election triumph and things are looking great for their odious leader, Nick Griffin. He's been pelted with eggs. Threatened with discrimination laws. But still, no party has started to discuss immigration. Westminster parties have kept their baffled silence and are giving the BNP a monopoly over the most explosive issue in politics. You'd think Gordon Brown and David Cameron would have been shocked into action after seeing Griffin win a seat in Brussels. Almost a MILLION voters chose the BNP. And make no mistake: we're not talking about a million racists. Griffin never mentions his whites-only membership policy. He campaigns, simply, on controlling immigration. In the recession, it's a bigger subject than ever because the layoffs are hitting British- born people hardest. http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/columnists/fraser_nelson/381725/Main-parties-refuse-to-get-to-grips-with-immigration-despite-BNPs-shaming-victory.html It seems stange to me that around 8 Acts of parliament and umpteen changes to immigration law, monthly changes to the [points system, regular newspaper coverage, reports from Immigration watch, IPPR, the TUC etc. etc. ad nauseum are all perceived by the News of the World as 'no party has started to discuss immigration'. It would be hard to think of a more inaccurate misrepresentation.
retep Posted June 29, 2009 Posted June 29, 2009 It seems stange to me that around 8 Acts of parliament and umpteen changes to immigration law, monthly changes to the [points system, regular newspaper coverage, reports from Immigration watch, IPPR, the TUC etc. etc. ad nauseum are all perceived by the News of the World as 'no party has started to discuss immigration'. It would be hard to think of a more inaccurate misrepresentation. Seems strange to me no one has hit back at their allegations, have you seen anything.
Plain Talker Posted June 29, 2009 Posted June 29, 2009 It's answers like these that lead to answers like this, Pathetic. If I had my way, I'd base Griffin in Westminster so MPs would see his smug face walking past every day. He is a reminder of THEIR failure to reach out to forgotten voters. Their failure to grapple with difficult subjects. Much as it pains me to agree, even partially, with retep, I agree with the emboldened comment, certainly.
Thunzi Posted June 29, 2009 Author Posted June 29, 2009 Thread closed. For the next part please click here.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.