swervin   10 #541 Posted July 17, 2009 no you dont the player holds all the aces ,he could just go through the motions and not really try ,then the owls would probably sell as he wouldn't be an asset to them as his contract is up next year Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
scoobydotcom   10 #542 Posted July 17, 2009 no you dont the player holds all the aces ,he could just go through the motions and not really try ,then the owls would probably sell as he wouldn't be an asset to them as his contract is up next year  then its our decision whether we keep him or not? i think you've just proved ur own comment wrong there... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
8balltiger   10 #543 Posted July 17, 2009 I agree with Swervin, as you may keep him but get nothing from him other than a depreciation in value, and still pay his wages.  Take the money thats on offer, he's already shown his cards, he wants away. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
scoobydotcom   10 #544 Posted July 17, 2009 I agree with Swervin, as you may keep him but get nothing from him other than a depreciation in value, and still pay his wages. Take the money thats on offer, he's already shown his cards, he wants away.  you never know, he might help us rip u lot apart this season, again ... according to his agent he wants to speak to Burnley, i dont believe anything any agent says and am waiting for a transfer request from him or as far as im concerned he's not that eager to go  i was arguing the fact that swervin says that Tudgay 'holds all the aces' we own his playing rights so we hold them all Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
8balltiger   10 #545 Posted July 17, 2009 I don't think that either of you hold all the aces. I think "Tudders" holds more. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
scoobydotcom   10 #546 Posted July 17, 2009 I don't think that either of you hold all the aces. I think "Tudders" holds more.  what makes you think that? if we dont want to sell him we dont have to Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
8balltiger   10 #547 Posted July 17, 2009 If he doesn't want to make much effort, he doesn't have to. It won't harm his bank balance too much, only yours (SWFC not Scooby's). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
scoobydotcom   10 #548 Posted July 17, 2009 If he doesn't want to make much effort, he doesn't have to. It won't harm his bank balance too much, only yours (SWFC not Scooby's).  thats the same with every football player and indeed every human with a job in the world, hardly relevant to the tudgay situation... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
8balltiger   10 #549 Posted July 17, 2009 A Sportsman has a job like no other job. Suppose he doesn't put in the effort.  Would you sack him? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
scoobydotcom   10 #550 Posted July 17, 2009 A Sportsman has a job like no other job. Suppose he doesn't put in the effort.  Would you sack him?  i dont see why not Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Stockers   10 #551 Posted July 17, 2009 what makes you think that? if we dont want to sell him we dont have to  Wednesday don't have to sell him but they'll have a disgruntled player on their hands and one who'll leave for nothing at the end of the season.  As this is the case i'd say the player has the upper hand. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
8balltiger   10 #552 Posted July 17, 2009 Even in this case , where he wants to move away and will go straight to another club, He holds more cards than SW do. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
