SteveBlade   10 #109 Posted April 10, 2008 If they couldnt but tickets for there own stand. Then tuff, but they did. The least they could do was not cheer. But they are a bit dim and deserved a lesson Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
mack69 Â Â 10 #110 Posted April 10, 2008 Â But no where else in the land would it be considered acceptable to blame the victims for an assault. But apparently, a football ground is different. Â They werent rapists. They werent paedophiles. They hadn't robbed someones house. if they were would that be seen as acceptable justice away from a football ground ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
2912clover   10 #111 Posted April 10, 2008 o well i think they let u anyway as long as your not in stands no1s ever said owt  the wednesday fans were smoking on the stands, but with how p**sed off they were I wasn't stopping them Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
mikey10 Â Â 10 #112 Posted April 10, 2008 well the owls fans were silly to go on the away end, im doing it at blackpool, but the main fighting was between blunts. and what about the scum of the earth blunts, spitting, throwing bottles of urine and coins at women and children, a discrace. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
freyasdad   10 #113 Posted April 10, 2008 Had they not been there, there would have been no trouble. End of story. In no way do I condone the animals' activity, but it wasn't going to happen without away fans being there.  Like i said HH , prevention is better than the cure or so we are led to believe. Schulz, would you say the same about wednesady fans? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
2912clover   10 #114 Posted April 10, 2008 I can't belive some 'tard decided to stop giving them upstairs and thought "oh, I know, I put people who hate them there instead" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
mikey10 Â Â 10 #115 Posted April 10, 2008 it was blunt v blunt on the kop. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
freyasdad   10 #116 Posted April 10, 2008 it was blunt v blunt on the kop.  Was you there then? I was on the cop and initially it looked like you lot to begin with. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
SpeedwayDan   10 #117 Posted April 11, 2008 Was you there then? I was on the cop and initially it looked like you lot to begin with.  why did it look like us lot? did they have wednesday shirts on? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
2912clover   10 #118 Posted April 11, 2008 why did it look like us lot? did they have wednesday shirts on?  no, they were just the people stupid enough to cheer for wednesday on the kop Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Annoni_mouse   10 #119 Posted April 11, 2008 They werent rapists. They werent paedophiles. They hadn't robbed someones house. if they were would that be seen as acceptable justice away from a football ground ?  Thats a completely different issue. If you want to ask 'Is it ok for vigilantes to pulverise murderers/nonces/robbers?' I suggest you start a topic as such over in general. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
2912clover   10 #120 Posted April 11, 2008 we're now starting to tackle a serious issue, and the question must be asked, are we ready to be serious about anything other than football on here Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...