knighthawk   10 #13 Posted December 29, 2008 One reason I went for a 180mm over the alternative (90mm). As one of my main subjects was to be my spiders + scorpions I didn't want my face too close to them I can see where you are coming from pal..I use a Tamron SP90 for most of my macro shots but at time I wish I had a little more distance as the Lizards never stay still Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Firparnian   10 #14 Posted June 21, 2012 I know that this is an old thread but I notice that Grissom recommended the Canon 100mm f2.8, if you see this Grissom is it the USM version. Just been looking at a used non USM, do you still rate it. Or has anybody else used this lense. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
KeeleyF   10 #15 Posted June 21, 2012 Hiii,  Macro is my favorite type of photography, Although I don't have any specialist equipment only a cheapish converter lens seems to work well enough for me and gets good results take a look  Keeley Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Mr Sheffield   10 #16 Posted June 25, 2012 I use a Canon 50mm Canon 1.8, here are a few of my recent macro shots.  Born to be Wild by Richard Cartawick, on Flickr   Blooming by Richard Cartawick, on Flickr   Born Free by Richard Cartawick, on Flickr   Alone Amongst a Sea of Daisy's by Richard Cartawick, on Flickr Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
LLVL Â Â 10 #17 Posted June 27, 2012 I know that this is an old thread but I notice that Grissom recommended the Canon 100mm f2.8, if you see this Grissom is it the USM version. Just been looking at a used non USM, do you still rate it. Or has anybody else used this lense. Â I have the 100m macro f2.8 and it is USM. Very good lens for non-L (there is an L version, but it's quite a bit more on top). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...