DIVA Â Â 10 #3469 Posted April 30, 2008 I started to look, but they only keep the last show available for "Listen Again". Â Thanks cgksheff, and Tony. That's a shame. Surely someone on the forum must have heard it? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
lizmachin   10 #3470 Posted April 30, 2008 Probably all be over in 24 hours. If not the lawyers start to earn money big time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
hockeybear   10 #3471 Posted April 30, 2008 Thanks cgksheff, and Tony. That's a shame. Surely someone on the forum must have heard it?  Yes I heard it, obviously I can't type out a full transcript of what was said but basically the councillers said that they cannot give a personal opinion because as members of Sheffield council they are responsible for the best interests of the park, but they all implied that a hospice is maybe not in the best interests of the park. The only guest who wasn't a counciller was the Conservative who did say Sheffield should not be selling off sheffield parkland for anything that did not benefit the park. Jan Wilson did say though that no application has been submitted from St Lukes, only a proposal and so there was nothing to vote on anyway. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
DIVA Â Â 10 #3472 Posted May 1, 2008 Yes I heard it, obviously I can't type out a full transcript of what was said but basically the councillers said that they cannot give a personal opinion because as members of Sheffield council they are responsible for the best interests of the park, but they all implied that a hospice is maybe not in the best interests of the park. The only guest who wasn't a counciller was the Conservative who did say Sheffield should not be selling off sheffield parkland for anything that did not benefit the park. Jan Wilson did say though that no application has been submitted from St Lukes, only a proposal and so there was nothing to vote on anyway. Â Thanks for that. Do you know if they had a phone in afterwards? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
anarchist   10 #3473 Posted May 1, 2008 Thanks for that. Do you know if they had a phone in afterwards?  Don't be fooled by politicians on the run up to an election.  They will say what they think the audience want to hear.  Read the thread to get their real views.  Don't let them get your vote by dropping your guard. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
cptntacredi   10 #3474 Posted May 1, 2008 I remain profoundly suspicious, particularly by Jan Wilson's impression that no application had been received from St.L's board, when back in February she said a definite application had been made.  Watch out for some fiddle being put up after the election.  It's not over till the fat lady sings.  Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
alchemist   37 #3475 Posted May 1, 2008 Just watch, they will suddenly find the plans from SLH, decide they need to be pushed through very quickly to make up lost time and backanders. This time next month there will be diggers in Graves Park Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
anarchist   10 #3476 Posted May 1, 2008 I remain profoundly suspicious, particularly by Jan Wilson's impression that no application had been received from St.L's board, when back in February she said a definite application had been made. Watch out for some fiddle being put up after the election.  It's not over till the fat lady sings.   I have an interesting question for redrobbo that he can answer without compromising his ability to vote on this matter.  The Charity Commission ruled that should this come to a vote by the trustees, then party whips could not be employed. This is to ensure that trustees act in the interest of the charity they represent and not the interests of some political party.  So... should the matter of a hospice in the park come to a vote would robbo ignore his party line and make a decision based on what was best for the Graves Park Charity? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Tony   10 #3477 Posted May 1, 2008 Perhaps as pertinently, if Labour get kicked out of power at today's election will St Luke's be seen to have been relying on political power at SCC?  Is that a right and proper thing for a charity to do? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
anarchist   10 #3478 Posted May 1, 2008 Perhaps as pertinently, if Labour get kicked out of power at today's election will St Luke's be seen to have been relying on political power at SCC? Is that a right and proper thing for a charity to do?  Someone will indoubtably ask the question Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
sccsux   10 #3479 Posted May 1, 2008 Someone will indoubtably ask the question  But not until after the count tomorrow;) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
I1L2T3 Â Â 10 #3480 Posted May 1, 2008 Don't forget the small matter of tomorrows local council election. As I understand it the Lib-Dems as a party have stated their opposition. Â They got my vote. Only time in 20 years I didn't vote Labour Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...