Guest Mod_Man   #13 Posted November 13, 2007 CPU's would be faster (they'd need physical changes tho) software would be smaller, ram would hold more.. etc....   This seems to be the big stumbling point though, do you really think that the industry would adopt a new system which would involve making every CPU obsolete? I don't think the RAM freed up versus complete redesign of CPUs is really worth changing a reliable, trusted, well known, very efficient standard system.  And how would the new computers running your system communicate with the computers running the old system?  I am interested. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Ghozer   112 #14 Posted November 13, 2007 This seems to be the big stumbling point though, do you really think that the industry would adopt a new system which would involve making every CPU obsolete? I don't think the RAM freed up versus complete redesign of CPUs is really worth changing a reliable, trusted, well known, very efficient standard system. And how would the new computers running your system communicate with the computers running the old system?  I am interested.  firstly, They say they have reached the physical limits in GHZ for a cpu, that is why dual/quad core is coming out, and slower clock speeds with faster instruction handling...  Im sure that high-end systems like government and business systems would implement new technology, if it was indeed faster, more stable etc... but the space the data takes up would be smaller too, so you could (theoretically) fit more than 1GB of info (by current standards) in 1GB of space..  as for new computers running my method, communicating with older ones, its all just software how computers communicate, so thats not difficult to do...  and no, i havent re-invented HEX, and yes, it works logically, i cannot find any potential faults or fall-outs in my method... at the moment atleast... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
xafier   10 #15 Posted November 13, 2007 the future of binary is quantum  anyway, if your idea is so fantastic then you should get in touch with a University with regards to doing a PhD.  I can give you contacts for SHU and University of Kent (Canterbury) if your interested, both good Uni's for IT research, so is Sheffield, Loughborough, Napier...  and anyway, you can't redefine binary as all binary is is a set of 0's and 1's... which then get translated by the processor into instructions and data Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Ghozer   112 #16 Posted November 13, 2007 yeah, 'redefine binary' is used loosly, as it would be a "new" and a replacement-for, it would probably be best called a derivitive of, or an evolution of... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Ivor&Mel   10 #17 Posted November 13, 2007 SHU, in one of its previous incarnations, was involved with the transputer - if anyone remembers that! So I hope they are not averse to innovative ideas... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
hussa1n   10 #18 Posted November 13, 2007 yeah, 'redefine binary' is used loosly, as it would be a "new" and a replacement-for, it would probably be best called a derivitive of, or an evolution of...   what's definition of "redefine"? lol  Ghozer...don't let anyone discourage you...and don't ever give up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
chri5 Â Â 10 #19 Posted November 14, 2007 If you are confident then you should spend a couple of hundred pounds on a patent. Keep quiet until it comes through, then start asking for sponsors/support & collaboration. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
rsyebor   10 #20 Posted November 14, 2007 ive shown this to one of my old lecturers who loves this kind of stuff. whats your email and i'll pass it onto him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
DaFoot   10 #21 Posted November 14, 2007 Be careful when discussing inventions like this with uni... if you progress it as an academic project (eg. MSc/PhD) the university will probably make a claim on ownership of the invention.  In the same way a company would claim ownership had you invented it while in their employment.  Just be aware of it when discussing it with them Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
sallonoroff   10 #22 Posted November 14, 2007 All the best for this Ghozer. Remember us when you're a billionaire...   . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
andco   10 #23 Posted November 14, 2007 Uni's are very good at knicking the ideas of their students and taking the credit for all the work involved. Get it patented and then conduct all discussions with anyone under a Non-Disclosure Agreement. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
melthebell   862 #24 Posted November 14, 2007 anything as revolutionary as this ghozer??  http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7085019.stm Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...