Understanding the universe.

THe Electronic Kilogram

 

NIST MENU

 

 

PROJECTS/PROGRAMS

Electronic Kilogram

SHARE

Facebook Google Plus Twitter

Summary

 

 

The physical object is losing mass.

 

.

It's because our flat earth is accelerating slightly less upward. Hence the downward reactionary force of the standard kilogram is reducing proportionally.

The "Watt" balance. This is how it works and what it looks like.

https://www.nist.gov/si-redefinition/kilogram-kibble-balance

A challenge to the Flat Earth theory.

The physical object may have had a bit too much polishing.

The "Watt" balance. This is how it works and what it looks like.

 

 

https://www.nist.gov/si-redefinition/kilogram-kibble-balance

The bloke who sandpapered a bit off the existing standard kg, is going to be in deep **** if they ever find out....

Waldo ,

Everytime anybody sneezed on the Kilogram the whole SI  system went up the Swanney.

NASA InSight to land on Mars tonight  -after 0100hrs.

On 11/17/2018 at 12:21 PM, petemcewan said:

The "Watt" balance. This is how it works and what it looks like.

 

 

https://www.nist.gov/si-redefinition/kilogram-kibble-balance

 

A challenge to the Flat Earth theory.

 

The physical object may have had a bit too much polishing.

Does the balance debunk the flat earth laws in some way?

They were able to defeat the Van Allen radiation belt in 69 - because they didn't know about it back then,lol.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-11-24/russia-verify-whether-usa-actually-landed-moon

Waldo

If you don't mind: what flat earth laws?

Aside: I just thought some flat-earther would jump in and suggest some occult sect  has been messing

with the Kilogram 

Mac33.

I've told the Forum that " Morgan The Moon" got there first.

1 hour ago, MAC33 said:

They were able to defeat the Van Allen radiation belt in 69 - because they didn't know about it back then,lol.

 

 

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-11-24/russia-verify-whether-usa-actually-landed-moon

Utter falsehoods from you again.

The Van Allen belts were found in the late 1950's as a consequence of the IGY as a cursory search of the literature will tell you. They had been mapped and explored thoroughly by the time of the Apollo missions.

Indeed the Apollo missions had a radiation plan...  https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/6.1969-19

Which rather proves they did know about it - as I have previously told you. Why you persist in such outright lies and dishonesty is beyond me.

2 hours ago, MAC33 said:

They were able to defeat the Van Allen radiation belt in 69 - because they didn't know about it back then,lol.

 

 

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-11-24/russia-verify-whether-usa-actually-landed-moon

What shape are all the other planets Mac?

1 hour ago, Obelix said:

 

Which rather proves they did know about it - as I have previously told you. Why you persist in such outright lies and dishonesty is beyond me.

 

 

I think you'll find its because people who do that, do it because they like triggering people...................

NASA employee admits we can't even leave earths lower orbit,never mind twice escaping the Van Allen radiation belt. Not to mention travelling a cool half a million miles or thereabouts return journey. And in 1969 - wow!