Jump to content

5G : massive health threat?

Recommended Posts

As I posted somewhere else on this forum a little while ago, it has been suggested that the real reason for felling massive numbers of street trees in Sheffield is so that 5G can be beamed into people's houses. This theory now seems to be true, as Sheffield is now applying for funding and local support to become a 5G testbed. Hmmm ... what a coincidence.

 

As has been stated before on here and on the STAG facebook pages, that's a load of nonsense.

 

It does pass for true on the David Icke Forum :cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As I posted somewhere else on this forum a little while ago, it has been suggested that the real reason for felling massive numbers of street trees in Sheffield is so that 5G can be beamed into people's houses. This theory now seems to be true, as Sheffield is now applying for funding and local support to become a 5G testbed. Hmmm ... what a coincidence.

 

Post hoc ergo propter hoc is a common fallacy you have fallen into...

 

Evidence that you need to fell trees to get 5G signals...?

 

 

tumbleweed.....

 

.

.

.

.

.

. exactly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As I posted somewhere else on this forum a little while ago, it has been suggested that the real reason for felling massive numbers of street trees in Sheffield is so that 5G can be beamed into people's houses. This theory now seems to be true, as Sheffield is now applying for funding and local support to become a 5G testbed. Hmmm ... what a coincidence.

 

That doesn’t make an ounce of sense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
As I posted somewhere else on this forum a little while ago, it has been suggested that the real reason for felling massive numbers of street trees in Sheffield is so that 5G can be beamed into people's houses. This theory now seems to be true, as Sheffield is now applying for funding and local support to become a 5G testbed. Hmmm ... what a coincidence.

 

I've heard Channel 4 don't like trees. Sheffield bidding for new Channel 4 building? Hmmm....what a coincidence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The trees are being cut down to let more sunlight reach the inhabitants of Sheffield as it is well known that they suffer from vitamin D deficiency and thus rickets.

Sheffielders are known in Rotherham as Bandylegs.

 

I can't get a link to this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Obelix asks where the evidence is that trees need to be cut down to enable 5G to get into the adjacent houses. The evidence is in an academic paper produced by Oxford University, the Government and one of the mobile phone providers. It states that for 100% reception of 5G, 100% of the trees need to be cut down. Does Obelix have more technical knowledge of this subject than Oxford University?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Obelix asks where the evidence is that trees need to be cut down to enable 5G to get into the adjacent houses. The evidence is in an academic paper produced by Oxford University, the Government and one of the mobile phone providers. It states that for 100% reception of 5G, 100% of the trees need to be cut down. Does Obelix have more technical knowledge of this subject than Oxford University?

 

I'm sure you can provide a link to this research as googling "Oxford University 5G trees" draws a complete blank.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Obelix asks where the evidence is that trees need to be cut down to enable 5G to get into the adjacent houses. The evidence is in an academic paper produced by Oxford University, the Government and one of the mobile phone providers. It states that for 100% reception of 5G, 100% of the trees need to be cut down. Does Obelix have more technical knowledge of this subject than Oxford University?

 

I think we are questioning what you are claiming as fact. As in we don’t believe you

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Obelix asks where the evidence is that trees need to be cut down to enable 5G to get into the adjacent houses. The evidence is in an academic paper produced by Oxford University, the Government and one of the mobile phone providers. It states that for 100% reception of 5G, 100% of the trees need to be cut down. Does Obelix have more technical knowledge of this subject than Oxford University?

 

On this sort of thing I would be considered an expert witness actually.

 

Your link or citation to this paper is.... where...?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Obelix asks where the evidence is that trees need to be cut down to enable 5G to get into the adjacent houses. The evidence is in an academic paper produced by Oxford University, the Government and one of the mobile phone providers. It states that for 100% reception of 5G, 100% of the trees need to be cut down. Does Obelix have more technical knowledge of this subject than Oxford University?

 

5G must be a bit rubbish if it can be stopped by a few trees.

 

But, like others, I’d quite like the evidence for your claims of catastrophic deforestation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
Obelix asks where the evidence is that trees need to be cut down to enable 5G to get into the adjacent houses. The evidence is in an academic paper produced by Oxford University, the Government and one of the mobile phone providers. It states that for 100% reception of 5G, 100% of the trees need to be cut down. Does Obelix have more technical knowledge of this subject than Oxford University?

 

OK, give us the title of this paper and when it was published, alternatively just point us at a link.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My mistake: the academic paper I was trying to refer to was actually produced by the University of Surry, the Government and Telefonica. Section 3.1 states "To avoid this shadowing loss and be outside of the Fresnel zone, it is necessary for the tree height to be at least 3m less than the base station height." The paper makes it clear that the high frequency involved in 5G can not penetrate trees of the same height as the transmitter. Hence the need, presumably, for Sheffield / Worcester / Gloucester etc. councils to cut down a vast proportion of the existing trees and replace them with saplings. The link is https://www.surrey.ac.uk/sites/default/files/White-Paper-Rural-5G-Vision_0.pdf.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.