Jew vs Muslim or Yank vs Brit? - Sun's take

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sport/boxing/2670619/Fight-of-faith.html

Why is the alledgedly pro-British Sun making a UK fighter vs US fighter bout about religion?

What they also have done is got Salita's bigoraphy and select quotes from wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dmitry_Salita

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sport/boxing/2670619/Fight-of-faith.html

 

Why is the alledgedly pro-British Sun making a UK fighter vs US fighter bout about religion?

Because it is a horrible rag and should only be used for wiping dogs' bottoms with.

Because it is a horrible rag and should only be used for wiping dogs' bottoms with.

How dare you insult dogs by suggesting that this vile scandal-rag should come into contact with their botties!

I feel quite contaminated, now!

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sport/boxing/2670619/Fight-of-faith.html

 

Why is the alledgedly pro-British Sun making a UK fighter vs US fighter bout about religion?

Because they don't want to highlight that the nasty Muslim is from these shores:rolleyes:

I did'nt think anyone was dim enough to read the Sun anymore. What with crap like the Sun and the cheapo glossies with their Jordan and Peter stories I dont read newspapers anymore and have had to revert to buying toilet paper again.

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sport/boxing/2670619/Fight-of-faith.html

 

Why is the alledgedly pro-British Sun making a UK fighter vs US fighter bout about religion?

Because they're a bunch of morons that write drivel. I'm annoyed that the 1 min it took to read that cr*p has been taken away from me.

Icon76, you owe me a minute!

I hate to admit being (mildly!) interested in the fact that never before has a Muslim faced a Jew in a title match; but not enough so to make it the sole point of an article. It's something that could be dealt in two sentences.

So far as I know, there are still, and only ever were, two reasons why so many people bought the Sun, and both of them point at you from somewhere on Page 3.

I hate to admit being (mildly!) interested in the fact that never before has a Muslim faced a Jew in a title match; but not enough so to make it the sole point of an article. It's something that could be dealt in two sentences.

 

 

So far as I know, there are still, and only ever were, two reasons why so many people bought the Sun, and both of them point at you from somewhere on Page 3.

Jesus, does the Sun have three pages, can Sun readers count that far!,bet page four is blank so they can understand something. Is the Sun a weekly paper then so they have time to read it before the next edition.

Abit like 'The People' that came through my door this morning. Getting ready to cancel that paper aswell.

tbh i read the story about Khan and the jewish guy and it was nothing really to do with hyoing up/ making bad either religion or using the suns politics.

all it was was surprise at the first time both types of religions have had fighters in the same match.

and explained how both follow their respective religions and religious traditions even upto the first bell of a match.

the thing that worries me is could there be a backlash when one of them loses the fight......we all know the tensions in the world over those two religions.

How dare you insult dogs by suggesting that this vile scandal-rag should come into contact with their botties!

 

I feel quite contaminated, now!

Im confused..are you calling yourself a dog and admitting wiping your bum with the sun