Jump to content

We are all poorer, much poorer

Recommended Posts

The TUC has published data which shows that real wages are still below what they were before the financial scandal of 2008, explaining that workers in Britain are experiencing the longest squeeze in real incomes in modern history. The term 'real wages' takes account of the impact of inflation, going up when wages are rising faster than average prices in the shops. According to the TUC real wages increased by 27% in the decade before the 2008 scandal, but in the decade since they have actually fallen by 4%. The TUC calculates that by 2025 every worker will be £18,500 worse off on average. But the government says inflation is falling and unemployment is at a forty year low, and sought to argue that the new higher national living wage had boosted pay for the lowest earners by more than £2000. Well, the government are simply trying to confuse oranges and apples, their claims are utterly irrelevant to the TUC's point.

 

The reality is that the government cannot deny such claims. In fact tory ministers will secretly be rejoicing at such news, citing it as confirmation that their ideological imposition of austerity is working just as planned - facilitating the transfer of wealth from ordinary people into the pockets of the multinational tax abusers while vital public services atrophy and workers public and private alike suffer demoralisation, exploitation and poverty.

 

Neoliberalism is for and by the one per-cent, at the expense of everyone else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest makapaka
The TUC has published data which shows that real wages are still below what they were before the financial scandal of 2008, explaining that workers in Britain are experiencing the longest squeeze in real incomes in modern history. The term 'real wages' takes account of the impact of inflation, going up when wages are rising faster than average prices in the shops. According to the TUC real wages increased by 27% in the decade before the 2008 scandal, but in the decade since they have actually fallen by 4%. The TUC calculates that by 2025 every worker will be £18,500 worse off on average. But the government says inflation is falling and unemployment is at a forty year low, and sought to argue that the new higher national living wage had boosted pay for the lowest earners by more than £2000. Well, the government are simply trying to confuse oranges and apples, their claims are utterly irrelevant to the TUC's point.

 

The reality is that the government cannot deny such claims. In fact tory ministers will secretly be rejoicing at such news, citing it as confirmation that their ideological imposition of austerity is working just as planned - facilitating the transfer of wealth from ordinary people into the pockets of the multinational tax abusers while vital public services atrophy and workers public and private alike suffer demoralisation, exploitation and poverty.

 

Neoliberalism is for and by the one per-cent, at the expense of everyone else.

 

Good post. Interesting point of view.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does it matters if we are 4% or 27% richer/poorer, if we are healthier/happier; unfortunately we are not even thinking about that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The TUC has published data which shows that real wages are still below what they were before the financial scandal of 2008, explaining that workers in Britain are experiencing the longest squeeze in real incomes in modern history. The term 'real wages' takes account of the impact of inflation, going up when wages are rising faster than average prices in the shops. According to the TUC real wages increased by 27% in the decade before the 2008 scandal, but in the decade since they have actually fallen by 4%. The TUC calculates that by 2025 every worker will be £18,500 worse off on average. But the government says inflation is falling and unemployment is at a forty year low, and sought to argue that the new higher national living wage had boosted pay for the lowest earners by more than £2000. Well, the government are simply trying to confuse oranges and apples, their claims are utterly irrelevant to the TUC's point.

 

The reality is that the government cannot deny such claims. In fact tory ministers will secretly be rejoicing at such news, citing it as confirmation that their ideological imposition of austerity is working just as planned - facilitating the transfer of wealth from ordinary people into the pockets of the multinational tax abusers while vital public services atrophy and workers public and private alike suffer demoralisation, exploitation and poverty.

 

Neoliberalism is for and by the one per-cent, at the expense of everyone else.

 

And yet inflation is DOWN and wages are RISING.

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-43808716

 

Someone's pants are on fire!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The TUC has published data which shows that real wages are still below what they were before the financial scandal of 2008, explaining that workers in Britain are experiencing the longest squeeze in real incomes in modern history. The term 'real wages' takes account of the impact of inflation, going up when wages are rising faster than average prices in the shops. According to the TUC real wages increased by 27% in the decade before the 2008 scandal, but in the decade since they have actually fallen by 4%. The TUC calculates that by 2025 every worker will be £18,500 worse off on average. But the government says inflation is falling and unemployment is at a forty year low, and sought to argue that the new higher national living wage had boosted pay for the lowest earners by more than £2000. Well, the government are simply trying to confuse oranges and apples, their claims are utterly irrelevant to the TUC's point.

 

The reality is that the government cannot deny such claims. In fact tory ministers will secretly be rejoicing at such news, citing it as confirmation that their ideological imposition of austerity is working just as planned - facilitating the transfer of wealth from ordinary people into the pockets of the multinational tax abusers while vital public services atrophy and workers public and private alike suffer demoralisation, exploitation and poverty.

 

Neoliberalism is for and by the one per-cent, at the expense of everyone else.

 

In 2012 the General Secretary of the TUC earned £88k pa.

In 2018 the General Secretary of the TUC earns £152k pa.

 

People in glass houses and all that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Neoliberalism is for and by the one per-cent, at the expense of everyone else.'

 

Unfortunately most people have never heard of neoliberalism, much less realise that we are living with a Neoliberal government.

 

For those who might want to know what it actually is:

 

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/apr/15/neoliberalism-ideology-problem-george-monbiot

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoliberalism

Edited by Anna B

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In 2012 the General Secretary of the TUC earned £88k pa.

In 2018 the General Secretary of the TUC earns £152k pa.

 

People in glass houses and all that.

 

Stop looking at this (low wages) and look over there (someone on high wages).

 

I think it's called distraction tactics.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In 2012 the General Secretary of the TUC earned £88k pa.

In 2018 the General Secretary of the TUC earns £152k pa.

 

People in glass houses and all that.

and? he gets a hefty pay packet but is still standing up for those without?

As Max says, pure distraction tactics :roll:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
and? he gets a hefty pay packet but is still standing up for those without?

As Max says, pure distraction tactics :roll:

 

_she_ does indeed get a hefty pay packet - but it's the 72% pay increase in six years I thought was impressive.

 

Is 72% the rate the TUC thinks we should all have received in 6 years? I thought I was doing well on 35%.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From 2008 to 2017 my pay has increased by 85%. This year my annual rise has gone up by a further 3.7%.

 

Just choose the data that suits your arguement and not look at the bigger picture why not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.